退宅还耕节余指标省域交易增值收益的分配研究——以安庆市宿松县为例

Research on Incremental Revenue Distribution of Surplus Indicators of Returning Residential Land to Farmland Provincial Trading:A Case Study of Susong County,Anhui Province

以土地增值链为视角,依据按损补偿原则构建土地增值收益分配模型,对退宅还耕节余指标省域交易增值收益的合理分配展开研究。结果表明:与传统增减挂钩节余指标流转相比,县(区)政府在退宅还耕节余指标交易中损失了规划建设用地规模,理应成为土地增值收益分配的主体;一户一宅退出模式下,农户与村集体损失了住房保障价值、社会保障价值与宅基地发展权价值,节余指标交易的增值收益在农户、村集体与县(区)政府三者间的合理分配格局为65.42%∶3.46%∶31.12%;对于建新不拆旧的一户多宅模式,农户由于没有形成价值损失,不再参与土地增值收益分配。该情境下,村集体与县(区)政府的土地增值收益分配比例为52.65%∶47.35%。对于合法继承型的一户多宅模式,农户、村集体与县(区)政府的土地增值分配比例为47.38%∶5.27%∶47.35%。研究认为:有资格参与指标交易的贫困县(区)政府应突出对一户一宅退地农民的增值收益分配,避免“一锅粥”式的分配办法给农民利益带来的侵害,让政府、村集体与农民都能享受增减挂钩政策红利。

Based on the principle of compensation according to property loss,the purpose of this paper is to develop a model for the revenue distribution from the perspective of value-added chain of land,which could provide a scientific basis for the reasonable revenue distribution of surplus indicators of returning residential land to farmland provincial trading.The results show that the county(district)government ought to be the subject of the revenue distribution because he lost the scale of urban-rural construction land in the surplus indicators of returning residential land to farmland trading compared with the past;In the withdrawal model of“one household,one housing land”,with the loss of housing security value,social security value and the residential land development right value,the farmers and the rural collective economic organization,the proportion to incremental revenue distribution among the farmers,the rural collective economic organization and the county(district)government are 65.42%,3.46%,31.12%respectively.In the withdrawal model of“one household,multiple housing lands”for new construction without dismantling the old idle,the farmers are no longer the subject of the revenue distribution because they have no loss,therefore,the proportion to incremental revenue distribution between the rural collective economic organization and the county(district)government are 52.65%,47.35%.Meanwhile,in the withdrawal model of“multiple residential land for one household”for lawful succession,the proportion to incremental revenue distribution among the farmers,the rural collective economic organization and the county(district)government are 47.38%,5.27%,47.35%respectively.It is concluded that the county(district)government who are eligible to engage in surplus indicators of increase-decrease hook provincial trading should focus on the compensation for the households with one residential land instead of the messy distribution method which damage the interests of the farmers.Only in this way,the policy of surplus indicators of increase-decrease hook provincial trading will be welcomed by the farmers,the rural collective economic organization and the county(district)government.