期刊文献+

基于融合算法的电动汽车AEB控制策略 被引量:6

AEB control strategy of electric vehicle based on fusion algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自动紧急制动(Autonomous Emergency Braking,AEB)是一种主动安全技术.为了解决安全距离算法或碰撞时间算法(Time-to-Collision,TTC)不能同时保障安全性和舒适性的问题,提出一种基于融合算法的控制策略,该策略综合利用安全距离算法和TTC算法,在安全距离算法中针对道路附着系数变化进行了优化,以两车最小相对距离为优化目标提高安全性,以预警时长为优化目标提高舒适性.建立了基于Carsim和Simulink仿真平台,对该策略进行了仿真分析.结果表明:在中国新车评价规程(China New Car Assessment Program,C-NCAP)中,该策略可以在不同工况下实现避撞功能并提升舒适性. Autonomous Emergency Braking(AEB)is an active safety technology.In order to solve the problem that the safe distance algorithm or the Time-to-Collision(TTC)algorithm cannot guarantee safety and comfort at the same time,an AEB control strategy based on fusion algorithm is proposed,which integrates the safe distance algorithm and TTC algorithm.This strategy is optimized for the road adhesion coefficient changes in the safe distance algorithm,with the minimum relative distance between two vehicles as the optimization goal to improve safety,and the warning time as the optimization goal to improve comfort.A simulation platform based on Carsim and Simulink is established to simulate and analyze the strategy.The results show that the strategy can achieve collision avoidance and improve comfort under different operating conditions in the China New Car Assessment Program(C-NCAP).
作者 辛佳庚 杨复钰 张宝迪 张欣 XIN Jiageng;YANG Fuyu;ZHANG Baodi;ZHANG Xin(School of Mechanical,Electronic and Control Engineering,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing 100044,China)
出处 《北京交通大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期77-86,93,共11页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY
基金 国家重点研发计划(2017YFB0103700) 中国博士后科学基金(2021M690010)。
关键词 电动汽车 融合算法 AEB控制策略 仿真测试 自动紧急制动 electric vehicle fusion algorithm AEB control strategy simulation test automatic emergency braking
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献45

  • 1王建强,迟瑞娟,张磊,李克强,于涛.适应驾驶员特性的汽车追尾报警-避撞算法研究[J].公路交通科技,2009(S1):7-12. 被引量:37
  • 2侯德藻,刘刚,高锋,李克强,连小珉.新型汽车主动避撞安全距离模型[J].汽车工程,2005,27(2):186-190. 被引量:49
  • 3余卓平,左建令,张立军.路面附着系数估算技术发展现状综述[J].汽车工程,2006,28(6):546-549. 被引量:52
  • 4ISMAIL K, SAYED N. Automated analysis of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using video data[ J ]. Transportation Research Record,2009, 2140:44-54.
  • 5PETRITSCH T A, CHALLA H, HUANG H, et al. Evaluation of geometric and operational characteristics affecting the safety of six-lane divided roadways: final report, BD 543 RPWO 5 [ R ] Florida: Florida Department of Transportation, 2007.
  • 6KAPARIAS I, BELL M G H, GREENSTED J, et al. Development and implementation of a vehicle-pedestrian conflict analysis method adaptation of a vehicle-vehicle technique [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 2010, 2010(2198) : 75 -82.
  • 7SVENSSON A, HYDEN C. Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour[ J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2006, 38 (2) : 379 - 385.
  • 8CATER D L, HUNTER W W, ZEGEER C V, et al. Pedestrian and bicyclist intersection safety indices: final report, FHWA-HRT-06-125 [ R]. McLean, VA: FHWA, 2006.
  • 9LAURESHYN A, SVENSSON A, HYDEN C. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(6) : 1637 - 1646.
  • 10BOUNET L, MIDENET S. Pedestrian crossing detection based on evidential fusion of video-sensors [ J ]. Transportation Research: Part C Emerging Technologies, 2009, 17(5) : 484 -497.

共引文献132

同被引文献94

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部