期刊文献+

新生儿低血糖临床规范管理专家共识(2021) 被引量:33

Expert consensus on standard clinical management of neonatal hypoglycemia in China(2021)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新生儿低血糖高危因素众多,严重持续的低血糖会导致不可逆的神经系统损伤,给家庭及社会带来极大负担。早期规范的预防及临床管理可有效降低新生儿低血糖及低血糖所致脑损伤的发生率。然而,目前国内尚无统一的新生儿低血糖临床管理指南,不同医疗机构借鉴不同的国外指南对新生儿低血糖进行临床管理,差异性较大。为进一步规范新生儿低血糖临床管理,由中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组制定了该共识。该共识针对胎龄35周及以上新生儿低血糖的预防、监测和管理的相关临床问题提出了21条推荐意见。[中国当代儿科杂志,2022,24 (1):1-13] There are many high-risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia, and persistent severe hypoglycemia can lead to irreversible neurological damage and bring a great burden to family and society. Early standardized prevention and clinical management can effectively reduce the incidence rate of neonatal hypoglycemia and brain injury induced by hypoglycemia;however at present, there is still a lack of unified clinical management guidelines for neonatal hypoglycemia in China, and different medical institutions follow different clinical guidelines developed by other countries for the management of neonatal hypoglycemia. In order to further standardize the clinical management of neonatal hypoglycemia, this consensus is developed by the Group of Neonatology, Pediatric Society, Chinese Medical Association. This consensus provides 21 recommendations to address related clinical issues in the prevention,monitoring, and management of hypoglycemia in neonates with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks.[Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2022, 24(1): 1-13]
作者 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组 巨容 包蕾 母得志 冯星 富建华 史源 周文浩 The Group of Neonatology,Pediatric Society,Chinese Medical Association
出处 《中国当代儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期1-13,共13页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
关键词 低血糖 临床实践 共识 新生儿 Hypoglycemia Clinical practice Consensus Neonate
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks ElM, Custers JWH, et al. Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy. BMC Health Serv Res, 2007, 7(1): 191.
  • 2Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. Guidelines for WHO Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003 (EIP/ GPE/EQC/2003.1 ).
  • 3World Health Organization. WHO Handbook of Guideline Development. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/75146/1/978924154844 l_eng.pdf.
  • 4World Health Organization. WHO Handbook of Guideline Development 2nd edition. Available at: http://www.who.int/kms/ handbook_2nd_ed.pdf.
  • 5GRADE Working Group. Available at: http://www. gradeworkinggroup.org.
  • 6World Health Organization. Twelfth General Programme of Work: not merely the absence of disease. Available at: http://www.who.int/ about/resources_planning/twelfth-gpw/en/.
  • 7Higgins JPT. Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 8Guyatt GH, Oxman A D, Schfinemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 380-382.
  • 9Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926.
  • 10Schfinemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et aL Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.

共引文献79

同被引文献298

引证文献33

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部