期刊文献+

两岸关系和平发展制度性安排的经验考察 被引量:4

An Empirical Study on the Institutional Arrangements for the Peaceful Development of Cross-Strait Relations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实现两岸关系的制度化是祖国大陆对台工作的重要目标之一。回顾和总结两岸协商谈判30年来的经验,对于两岸关系和平发展达成制度性安排的民主协商具有借鉴和启示意义。在推进两岸关系和平发展制度化的过程中,必须在一个中国原则的基础上开展平等协商;必须充分考虑两岸实力对比的不对称性和两岸诉求重心的差异性,作出合情合理的安排。两岸协商谈判从单纯的经济领域拓展至社会领域,乃至暗含了具有相当敏感度的政治议题,已经产生溢出效应。因此,应当充分发掘两岸既有谈判成果的潜在资源,从而为更大范围内的两岸政治对话和谈判积累经验,为未来两岸关系和平发展制度性安排的突破奠定基础。 The institutionalization of cross-Strait relations is one of the important objectives of the Mainland s work on Taiwan.Reviewing and summarizing the experience of cross-Strait consultation and negotiation in the past 30 years has reference and enlightenment significance for the democratic consultation of reaching institutional arrangements for the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations.In the process of promoting the institutionalization of the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations,equal consultation must be carried out on the basis of the One China Principle.Fully considering the asymmetry of cross-strait strength comparison and the difference of cross-Strait appeal focus,we must make reasonable arrangements.Cross-Strait consultations and negotiations have expanded from the simple economic field to the social field,and even implied quite sensitive political issues,which has produced spillover effects.Therefore,we should fully explore the potential resources of the existing results of cross-Strait negotiations,so as to accumulate experience for cross-Strait political dialogue and negotiations in a wider range,and lay a foundation for the breakthrough of institutional arrangements for the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations in the future.
作者 季烨 JI Ye(Institute for Taiwan Studies,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian,China)
出处 《闽台关系研究》 2021年第4期24-33,共10页 Research on Fujian-Taiwan Relationship
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BFX039)。
关键词 两岸关系 和平发展 制度性安排 一个中国原则 cross-Strait relations peaceful development institutional arrangements One China Principle
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献24

  • 1陈云林.积极促进两岸对话与谈判,开创两岸关系发展新局面[J].两岸关系,2003(5):10-12. 被引量:1
  • 2陈安.中国“入世”后海峡两岸经贸问题“政治化”之防治[J].中国法学,2002(2):40-55. 被引量:10
  • 3王建民.《两岸投保协议签署一再延后的警讯》,http://www.zhgpl.eom,2012年11月23日.
  • 4《台胞权益保护真相国台办答中评社》,http://www.zhgpl.corn,2012年9月25日.
  • 5任清.《简析<海峡两岸投资保护和促进协议>--兼谈台商如何在大陆解决投资争端和争议》,《第二属两岸和平发展法学论坛论文集》(下),海峡两岸关系法学研究会,2013年8月,第812页.
  • 6Susan D. Franck, "The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through In- consistent Decisions", Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, 2005.
  • 7Francisco Orrego Vicufia, International Dispute Settlement in an Evolving Global Society, ( Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 64 - 65.
  • 8Roberto Dafiino, Opening Remarks, ICSID, OECD & UNCTAD, Making the Most of International Investment Agree- ments : A Common Agenda, ( Paris : OECD, 2005) , p. 3.
  • 9UNCTAD, Investor-State Disputes : Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration, ( United Nations, 2010) , p. xxiii.
  • 10全国人大常委会法工委民法室,中华人民共和国司法部法制司编著.《中华人民共和国人民调解法解读》,中国法制出版社2010年版,第13页.

共引文献540

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部