网络平台风险的包容性治理:逻辑展开、理论嵌合与优化路径

Inclusive Governance of Network Platform Risk:Logical Extension,Theoretical Embeddedness and Optimization Path

网络平台风险治理随着平台对人类社会运行的深刻嵌入而成为现代风险社会的重要命题。网络平台风险是平台风险治理的前置性问题,从平台权力兴起与权力驯化两个维度来看,平台权力的兴起既是平台风险生成的基本动因,但对其权力的驯服也内在的成为国家治理能力现代化重要目标。包容性治理以尊重差异为基点、协商合作为核心、权力(利)规范为实现路径,其目的在于不同治理主体对治理成果的共享,实现社会和谐、政府治理、市场创新、公众权益保障之间的平衡与发展。这一理论适用于网络平台风险治理,不仅能够促进治理主体权力(利)配置的均衡、为权力(利)互动提供了制度空间,还有利于更好地发挥政府“元治理”作用、实现对平台自我规制的引导,以及增强平台风险治理体系的弹性。网络平台风险包容性治理优化路径的关键在于运用整体性思维,以引导赋能核心、权力规范、多元参与为核心,从法律规制、平台自我规制、社会规制三个层面,依据平台及其应用场景的差异进行类型化完善。

Risk management of network platform has become an important proposition in modern risk society with the deep embedding of the platform into the operation of human society.Network platform risk is the pre-existing problem of platform risk governance.From the two dimensions of platform power rise and power domestication,the rise of platform power is not only the basic motivation of platform risk generation,but the taming of its power has also become an important goal of modernization of national governance capacity.Inclusive governance takes respect for differences as the basic point,consultation and cooperation as the core,and power standardization as the realization path.Its purpose is to share the governance achievements of different governance subjects and realize the balance and development among social harmony,government governance,market innovation and public rights and interests protection.The application of this theory to network platform risk management can not only promote the balance of power allocation of governance subjects and provide institutional space for power interaction,but also help the government to play a better role of"meta-governance",realize the guidance of platform self-regulation,and enhance the flexibility of platform risk management system.The key to the optimization path of risk inclusive governance of network platform lies in the use of holistic thinking,with the core of guiding empowerment,standardizing power and multiparticipation as the core,and making typological improvement from three levels:legal regulation,platform self-regulation and social regulation,and according to the differences between platforms and their application scenarios.