摘要
目的探讨舒适护理在阑尾炎手术患者中的应用效果。方法选取牡丹江市医学院附属红旗医院2017年12月至2020年4月收治的124例阑尾炎切除术(AS)患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为试验组与对照组,每组各62例。对照组采用常规基础干预完成手术治疗,试验组采用舒适护理完成手术治疗。比较两组的广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)评分、压力知觉量表(CPSS)评分、简明舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分、文字描述疼痛评估量表(VDS)评分及并发症总发生率。结果试验组干预后的GAD-7评分、CPSS评分、VDS评分、并发症总发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组干预后的GCQ评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论AS患者联合应用舒适护理,能够提高其舒适度及安全性,减轻其疼痛感与心理压力。
Objective To explore the effect of comfortable nursing in patients with appendicitis surgery(AS).Methods A total of 124 appendicitis surgery patients who were admitted to Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical College from December 2017 to April 2020 were selected as the research subjects,and they were divided into experimental group and control group according to random number table method,with 62 cases in each group.The control group received conventional basic intervention to complete the surgical treatment,and the experimental group was treated with comfortable nursing to complete the surgical treatment.The generalized anxiety disorder-7(GAD-7)score,Chinese perceived stress scale(CPSS)score,general comfort questionnaire(GCQ)score,verbal descriptors scale(VDS)score and the total rate of complications between the two groups were compared.Results The GAD-7 score,CPSS score,VDS score and the total complication rate of experimental group after intervention were all lower than those of control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The GCQ score of experimental group after intervention was higher than that of control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The combined application of comfort nursing in AS patients can improve their comfort and safety,and reduce their pain and psychological pressure.
作者
马丹
王杨
李术平
李佳
MA Dan;WANG Yang;LI Shuping;LI Jia(Operating Room,Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical College,Heilongjiang Province,Mudanjiang157000,China)
出处
《中国当代医药》
CAS
2022年第2期194-196,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
阑尾炎手术
舒适护理
可行性
心理压力
Appendicitis surgery
Comfortable nursing
Feasibility
Psychological pressure