期刊文献+

新型胸引管在单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术ERAS中的应用价值 被引量:1

Application value of novel thoracic drainage tube in ERAS during uniportal thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察在单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术中12 F猪尾巴管作为新型胸引管在加速康复外科(ERAS)中的应用价值。方法研究纳入2018年1月至2020年12月我院收治的200例肺癌患者,均接受单孔胸腔镜下根治术,利用随机法分组,观察组100例患者予以改良型ERAS肋间神经阻滞+12 F猪尾巴管作为新型胸引管留置,对照组100例予以生理盐水20 mL阴性对照+传统胸引管,比较两组术后疼痛程度、引流效果、住院时间及并发症情况。结果两组术后疼痛程度评分比较,观察组患者术后1、24、48、72 h评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者引流时间短于对照组,且术后24、48 h引流量均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症总发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在ERAS基础上,对单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者应用猪尾巴管作为新型胸引管,可有效减轻患者术后疼痛,减少术后引流量,缩短引流时间,有利于预防术后并发症,促使患者快速康复,早日出院,减轻家庭经济负担,值得推广。 Objective To observe the application value of 12 F pig-tail tube as a novel thoracic drainage tube in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS)during uniportal thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer.Methods A total of 200 patients with lung cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were included in the study.All patients received uniportal thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer and were randomly divided into the observation group(n=100)and the control group(n=100).The observation group was treated with intercostal nerve block in modified ERAS and 12 F pig-tail tube as a new type of thoracic intubation,while the control group was treated with 20 mL normal saline as the negative control and traditional thoracic intubation.The postoperative pain,drainage effect,hospitalization time and complications of the two groups were compared.Results The score of postoperative pain were significantly lower in the observation group 1 h,24 h,48 h and 72 h after operation than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The drainage time was shorter in the observation group than that in the control group,and the drainage volumes 24 h and 48 h after operation were both less in the observation group than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The total incidence rate of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the observation group than that in the control group,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The hospitalization time was shorter in the observation group than that in the control group,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion On the basis of ERAS,pig-tail tube as a new type of thoracic drainage tube can effectively relieve postoperative pain,reduce postoperative drainage volume,shorten drainage time,help prevent postoperative complications and promote faster recovery,thus helping patients discharge from hospital as soon as possible,and reducing family economic burden for patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer,which is worth popularization.
作者 孙宇 李束 施谷平 马兴杰 SUN Yu;LI Shu;SHI Guping;MA Xingjie(Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,the First Hospital of Jiaxing City in Zhejiang Province,Jiaxing 314000,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2021年第34期101-104,共4页 China Modern Doctor
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2018KY800) 浙江省嘉兴市科技计划项目(2018AD32053)。
关键词 快速康复外科 肺癌 单孔胸腔镜下根治术 猪尾巴管 Enhanced recovery after surgery Lung cancer Uniportal thoracoscopic radical resection Pig-tail tube
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献163

  • 1汪永义,尹邦良.胸腔镜外科的发展、现状与思考[J].医学与哲学(B),2006,27(7):13-15. 被引量:2
  • 2刘靖,张宏.剖胸术后镇痛[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(11):978-980. 被引量:7
  • 3LiJS. Systemic cognition to connotation of FTS. National MedJ Chin, 2007, 87(8): 515-517.
  • 4Jiang zw, Li N, LiJS, et al. On conception and clinical significance of FTS.J Chin Mod Surg, 2007, 27(2): 131-133.
  • 5Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. AmJ Surg, 2002, 183(6): 630-641.
  • 6Basse L, Raskov HH, Hiort Jakobsen D, et al. Accelerated postoperative re- covery program after colonic resection improves physical performance, pul- monary function and body composition. BrJ Surg, 2002, 89(4): 446-453.
  • 7Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, et al. Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition, 2002, 18(2): 147-152.
  • 8Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H. Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg, 2001, 88(11): 1498-1500.
  • 9Basse L, Hiort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg, 2000, 232 (1): 51-57.
  • 10LiJS. Nutrition and fast track surgery. J Parenter Enteral Nutr~ 2007, 14(2): 65-67.

共引文献1812

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部