期刊文献+

“新世界文学”的范式特征及局限 被引量:5

The Paradigm,Features and Limitations of“New World Literature”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 始自20世纪90年代的"新世界文学"理论显现出本体论、认识论以及方法论上的根本改变:它不再是稳定的、本质主义的,而是关系的、网络的,是过程性的"发生";其认识论的"单元观念"不再是民族和语言,不是二元的,而是多元的、更加关注作为现象学的翻译研究;由于人文学科研究中"语文学的破产",以及世界文学文本的日趋庞杂,研究者提倡合作、使用跨学科的研究方法,特别是在大数据时代,数字人文的兴起在方法论上解决文本过剩的问题。虽然"新世界文学"理论面临陷入相对主义的危险,但却形成了新的比较文学研究共同体,凸显本学科的人文价值。 The beginning of the 1990 s saw a fundamental change in ontology,epistemology and methodology in the theory of new world literature.It is no longer stable and essentialist,but turns into a relationship,a network and a process of occurrence.Its epistemology is no longer dualistic,but pluralistic,transcending the boundaries of nationality and language to emphasize the translated text as a phenomenological ontology.Due to“the bankruptcy of philology”in the study of humanities and the increased complication of world literature,researchers advocate cooperation and the use of interdisciplinary methods.Digital humanities,in particular,emerge in the age of big data in order to solve the methodological problems in their study.Although the theory of new world literature risks relativism,it has promoted a new research community within comparative literature that highlights the humanistic value of the discipline.
作者 郝岚 Hao Lan(the Institute for Cross-Culture&World Literature Studies,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387)
出处 《文艺理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期148-157,共10页 Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
关键词 新世界文学 范式 本体论 认识论 方法论 局限 “new world literature” paradigm ontology epistemology methodology limitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1See Edward W. Said, The World, the Text, and the Critic 5-9,16,21,29.
  • 2See Erich Auerbach, “Philology and Weltliteratur,” The Princeton Sourcebook in Comparative Literature, ed.David Damrosch (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2009) 116-38.
  • 3Apter, Emily. “Global Translation: The ‘Invention,of Comparative Literature, Istanbul, 1933.” Critical Inquiry 2 (2003): 253-81.
  • 4Auerbach, Erich. Literary Language & Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1993.
  • 5埃里希.奥尔巴赫:《摹仿论》,吴麟绶等译.北京:商务印书馆,2014年.
  • 6Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Wu Linshou et al. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2014.
  • 7Damrosch, David. “Auerbach in Exile.” Comparative Literature 2 (1995): 97-117.
  • 8Lindenberger, Herbert. “On the Reception of Mimesis.” Literary History and the Challenge of Philology. The Legacy of Erich Auerbach. Ed. Seth Lerer. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1996. 209-316.
  • 9Mufti, Aamir R. “Auerbach in Istanbul: Edward Said, Secular Criticism, and the Question of Minority Culture.” Critical Inquiry 1 (1998): 95-125.
  • 10Said,Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon, 1978.

共引文献11

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部