摘要
近年来在城市研究与城乡规划领域,城市韧性正作为应对风险的一种理念受到广泛关注。本文从城市韧性内涵和数值的表征方式出发,对当前城市韧性的测度方法进行总结,认为多样的测度方法可被归入基于过程、基于状态两种评估路径之下。通过对国际案例的梳理,文章阐述了两种评估路径下城市韧性所关注的重点和具体测度方法,指出各自所适用的实践情境,并就今后我国城市韧性测度的发展方向提出了动态化、精细化和多元化等思考。
In recent literatures about urban studies,urban resilience has been widely discussed as a strategy to copy with risk.Based on concepts and theories of urban resilience summarized from existing researches,this paper proposes two analyzing paradigms to conduct quantitative measurement with introduction to cases of assessment on urban resilience in international practice,which is to analyze urban resilience as a process and as an outcome.Furthermore,the differences of epistemology around and quantitative methods of urban resilience involved in these two paradigms are elaborated subsequently,and lead to a suggestion that quantitative measurement of resilience in China should follow the epistemology drawn from local practices.Meanwhile,this paper also suggests that more dynamic,precise and diversified measurement will contribute to a more comprehensive assessment of urban resilience in the future of China.
作者
段怡嫣
翟国方
李文静
Duan Yiyan;Zhai Guofang;Li Wenjing
出处
《国际城市规划》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第6期79-85,共7页
Urban Planning International
关键词
城市韧性
韧性测度
韧性评估
韧性评价指标
韧性分析范式
Urban Resilience
Resilience Measurement
Resilience Assessment
Resilience Evaluation Index
Analyzing Paradigms of Resilience