期刊文献+

经阴道超声与经腹部超声诊断剖宫产切口部妊娠的临床研究 被引量:1

The Clinical Research of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Transabdominal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of CSP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经阴道超声与经腹部超声诊断剖宫产切口部妊娠(CSP)的诊断价值。方法:选择2016年4月~2019年4月朝阳市中心医院妇科收治的可疑CSP患者98例,对患者进行经阴道超声及经腹部超声检查,比较两种检查方法诊断CSP的准确度、灵敏度与特异度及对比较经阴道超声与经腹部超声诊断CSP不同类型的超声诊断符合率。结果:经阴道超声组诊断的CSP的准确度为90.4%,灵敏度为92.1%,特异度为67.5%,经腹部超声组诊断CSP的准确度为72.9%,灵敏度为83.4%,特异度为45.1%,两组差异相比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经阴道超声诊断CSP妊娠囊完全突入型的符合率为100%,诊断CSP妊娠囊部分突入型的符合率为92.81%,诊断CSP混合团块型的符合率为97.22%,经腹部超声诊断CSP妊娠囊完全突入型的符合率为80.00%,诊断CSP妊娠囊部分突入型的符合率为73.80%,诊断CSP混合团块型的符合率为77.77%,两组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经阴道超声诊断对CSP的诊断效能较高,能准确判断孕囊的位置及类型,为临床医师提供准确的信息,提供个体化的治疗依据,具有重要的参考价值。 Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of transvaginal ultrasonography and transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cesarean incision pregnancy(CSP).Methods:98 patients with suspected CSP treated in the Department of Gynecology of Chaoyang Central Hospital from April 2016 to April 2019 were examined by transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound.The accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of the two methods in the diagnosis of CSP were compared,and the coincidence rates of transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of different types of CSP were compared.Results:The accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of CSP in transvaginal ultrasound group were 90.4%,92.1%and 67.5%,respectively;The accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of CSP were 72.9%,83.4%and 45.1%,respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).The coincidence rate of transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of CSP pregnancy sac completely protruding type was 100%,that of CSP pregnancy sac partially protruding type was 92.81%,and that of CSP mixed mass type was 97.22%;The coincidence rate of abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of CSP pregnancy sac completely protruding type was 80.00%,that of CSP pregnancy sac partially protruding type was 73.80%,and that of CSP mixed mass type was 77.77%.There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:Transvaginal ultrasonography has high diagnostic efficiency for CSP,can accurately determine the location and type of gestational sac,provide accurate information for clinicians,and provide individualized treatment basis,which has important reference value.
作者 刘玉蕾 LIU Yu-lei(Department of Ultrasonography,Chaoyang Central Hospital,Liaoning Chaoyang 122000)
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2022年第1期109-111,共3页 China Medical Device Information
关键词 经阴道超声 经腹部超声 瘢痕妊娠 临床价值 transvaginal ultrasound transabdominal ultrasound CSP clinical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘晞,刘芳荪,刘东.腔内彩色多普勒超声在剖宫产术后子宫下段切口妊娠诊断中的应用[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(8):1208-1211. 被引量:26
  • 2严英榴 杨秀雄 沈理.产前超声诊断学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.332-336.
  • 3常才.经阴道超声诊断学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2007.365-368
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 5Bashiri A, Burstein E,Rosen S, et al. Clinical significance ofuterine scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean deliv-ery:prevalence and independent risk factors [j].j Reprod Med,2008,53(1):8-14.
  • 6Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First- trimester diagno-sis and management of pregnancies implanted into the loweruterine segment cesarean section scar [J]. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol, 2003, 21(3): 220- 227.
  • 7Hassan I,Lower A, Overton C. Ectopic pregnancy within a ce-sarean section scar [j ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 27(4):475-476.
  • 8Rotas MA,Haberman S,Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic preg-nancies:etiology, diagnosis and management [J]. Obstet Gyne-col, 2006,107: 1373-1377.
  • 9Yang Q, Piao SH, Wang GW, et al. Hysteroscopit' surgery forectopic pregnancy in the cesarean scar[j]. J Minim Invas Gyne-col, 2009, 16(4):432-436.
  • 10Avva R, Shah HR, Angtuaco TL. US case of the day. Placentaincreta[j]. Radiographics, 1999, 19( 4) : 1089- 1092.

共引文献74

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部