期刊文献+

义务教育阶段教师教育创新能力的现状及其影响因素研究 被引量:3

Research on the Status Quo and Influencing Factors of Teachers’ Educational Innovation Ability in Compulsory Education Stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以866名义务教育阶段教师为研究对象,采用多用途测验、中文远距离联想测验、创造性教学行为量表等工具探讨教师教育创新能力的现状,以及学段、教龄、任教学科类型等因素对教师教育创新能力的影响。研究结果表明:在创造性思维上,初中教师思维的流畅性显著好于小学教师;教师的创造性教学行为总体上呈现出随教龄的增长而增长的趋势,在教龄为7~15年时,任教学科类型对教师的创造性教学行为表现出显著影响;在创造性个性特征上,初中教师的一般创造力显著好于小学教师。小学教师的创造性教学效能感总体上随教龄的增长而增长,初中各教龄阶段教师的创造性教学效能感之间没有显著差异。在教龄为7~15年时,任教学科类型对教师的创造性教学效能感表现出显著影响。研究结论为:在培养教师教育创新能力的过程中,要综合考虑学段、教龄和任教学科类型等因素的影响,抓住教师教育创新能力发展变化的敏感期(教龄7~15年),从创造性思维训练、创造性教学行为培养、创造性教学效能感提升、创造性班级氛围营造等多途径培养教师教育创新能力。 Taking 866 teachers at the compulsory education stage as the research objects,Alternate Uses Task,C-Remote Association Task,creative teaching behavior scales and other tools were used to explore the status quo of teachers’ educational innovation capabilities and the influence of factors such as school period,teaching age,and type of teaching subjects.The results of the research showed that:Junior high school teachers are significantly better than elementary school teachers in the fluency of creative thinking;Teachers’ creative teaching behaviors generally show a trend of increasing with the increase of teaching age.When the teaching age is 7~15 years,the type of subject has a significant impact on the creative teaching behavior;The general creativity of junior high school teachers is significantly better than that of elementary school teachers.The creative teaching efficacy of primary school teachers generally increases with the increase of teaching age,and there is no significant difference between the creative teaching efficacy of teachers of different teaching ages in junior high schools.When the teaching age is 7~15 years,the type of subject has a significant impact on the teachers creative teaching efficacy.The conclusion is that in the process of cultivating teachers’ educational innovation ability,it is important to take the influence of factors such as school stage,teaching age,type of teaching subject and as well as the sensitive period(teaching age 7~15 years) into consideration,and to adopt comprehensive methods such as creative thinking training,creative teaching behavior training,creative teaching efficiency training,and creative class atmosphere construction to cultivate teachers’ educational innovation ability.
作者 韩迎春 吴海坚 梁慧勤 陈慧华 陈明树 HAN Yingchun;WU Haijian;LIANG Huiqin;CHEN Huihua;CHEN Mingshu(Teacher Education College,Guangdong University of Education,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510303,P.R.China;Education Development Center,Shunde District,Foshan,Guangdong,528300,P.R.China;Guangzhou Baiyun Xingzhi Vocational and Technical School,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510515,P.R.China;Institute of Educational Science of Baoan District,Shenzhen,Guangdong,518000,P.R.China;Teacher Training School,Dongguan,Guangdong,523000,P.R.China)
出处 《广东第二师范学院学报》 2022年第1期90-102,共13页 Journal of Guangdong University of Education
基金 广东省2021年度教育科学规划课题(高等教育专项)“大学生创造性表现的提升机制研究:认知抑制的视角”(2021GXJK253)。
关键词 义务教育 教师 教育创新能力 发散思维 创造性教学行为 创造性个性特征 compulsory education teacher educational innovation ability divergent thinking creative teaching behavior creative personality characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

共引文献74

同被引文献29

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部