摘要
破产债权异议诉讼实践中存在当事人地位的错置。《破产法司法解释(三)》第九条虽在一定程度上缓解了错置的混乱,但在“债权人对他人债权存有异议”情况下提起的诉讼中,并未将债务人列为被告。破产债权异议诉讼针对破产管理人审核债权的行为提起,囿于破产管理人的职务性质,破产管理人只能以债务人名义参加诉讼,债务人应是本诉的当然当事人,并视债务人自身对异议人所提异议的态度,列为共同原告或共同被告。
The parties to claim dissent litigations are misplaced in bankruptcy cases.Although Article 9 of Judicial Interpretation of the Bankruptcy Law(Ⅲ)mitigates this misplacement to some extent,debtors are still not listed as defendants in the litigations that creditors dissent other parties’rights.Claim dissent litigations are filed against the actions of bankruptcy administrators.Because of their duties,bankruptcy administrators can only participate in the litigations as debtors.Debtors should be listed as the parties to the litigations as co-plaintiff or co-defendant based on debtors’attitude towards the dissent of dissenters.
作者
郝钰麟
HAO Yulin(Law Department,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》
2022年第1期57-62,共6页
Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition
关键词
破产债权异议诉讼
债务人
共同原告
共同被告
bankruptcy claim dissent litigation
debtor
co-plaintiff
co-defendant