期刊文献+

地方师范院校教师业绩评价优化研究 被引量:2

Research on the Optimization of Teacher Performance Evaluation in Local Normal University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师业绩评价是师资队伍建设的核心问题,对于地方高校教师业绩评价,没有现成的具有普遍适用性的业绩评价体系,传统教师业绩评价存在评价理念重奖惩轻发展,评价模式重主体轻客体,评价标准重统一轻个性,评价方式重定量轻定性,评价运用重结果轻过程等亟待解决的问题,地方师范院校教师评价要在突出教师主体中更新评价理念,在注重特色个性中优化评价标准,在着眼准确实效中改进评价方式,在强化结果运用中发挥评价功能。 Teacher performance evaluation is the core issue of faculty development,and there is no ready-made university teacher performance evaluation system with universal applicability for local university teachers'performance evaluation to be applied.Traditional teacher performance evaluation has problems that need to be solved,such as the evaluation concept emphasizing rewards and punishments rather than development,the evaluation mode emphasizing subjects rather than objects,the evaluation standard emphasizing uniformity rather than individuality,the evaluation method emphasizing quantity rather than quality,and the evaluation application emphasizing results rather than process.The evaluation of teachers in local teacher training colleges should update the evaluation concept in highlighting the main body of teachers,optimize the evaluation criteria in focusing on characteristics and individuality,improve the evaluation methods in focusing on accuracy and effectiveness,and give full play to the evaluation function in strengthening the application of results.
作者 章逸 徐知之 万莹聪 ZHANG Yi;XU Zhi-zhi;WAN Ying-cong(School of Mathematics and Information Science,Nanchang Normal University,Nanchang 330032,China)
机构地区 南昌师范学院
出处 《南昌师范学院学报》 2021年第6期108-112,共5页 Journal of Nanchang Normal University
基金 江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目“地方高校高层次人才绩效管理研究——以江西省N校为例”,编号:JY17127。
关键词 地方师范院校 教师业绩评价 优化 local normal university teacher performance evaluation optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1(美)Warren J.Keegan.全球营销管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998..
  • 2Shinkfied, A. T. & Stufflebeam, D., Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
  • 3Anderson, L. W. , International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher education (2th ) , Pargamon Press,1995.
  • 4Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J, 'Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance' , In.. "N. Sehmitt, & W. C. Borman (ed.), Personnel Selection in Organizations, Jossey-Bass Pulishers, 1993:71-98.
  • 5Murphy, K. J. & Cleveland, J. N. , Performance appraisal : An organizational perspective, Allyn & Bacon Publishers, 1991.
  • 6Aubrecht, J. D. , Hanna G. S. & Hoyt, D. P. , 'A comparison of high school student ratings of teaching effectiveness with teacher self- ratings: Factor analytic and multrait- multimethod analyses',Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986, 46 (1) : 223-31.
  • 7Wagner, R. B. , Accountability in Education : A Philosophical Inquiry, New York : Routeledge, 1989.
  • 8NcNeil, J. D. , Politics of Teacher Evaluation, In J. Millman (ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation,Beverly Hills : Sage, 1981.
  • 9Duke, D. L. , 'Developing Teacher Evaluation Systems That Promote Professional Growth', Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1990, 4: 131-144.
  • 10Berliner, D. C. , 'Expertise.. The Wonder of Exemplary Performances', In J. N. Mangieri and C. C.Block (eds.), Creating Powerful Thinking in Teachers and Students, Fort Worth : Harcourt Brace,19942 161-186.

共引文献155

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部