我国综合性农业科技期刊影响力现状——基于省级农业科学院主办期刊评价结果分析

Current Status of the Influence of Comprehensive Agricultural Sci-tech Journals in China——Based on the Analysis of the Evaluation Results of Journals Sponsored by Provincial Academies of Agricultural Sciences

为了解我国省级农业科学院主办的综合性农业科技期刊的影响力现状,综合核心期刊、引文数据库评选结果以及引证报告数据,分析近年来27种省级农业科学院主办的学术性综合性农业科技期刊的评价结果变化并与全国农业综合类期刊进行对比,以明确该类期刊在我国各种涉农期刊评价中的影响力水平以及各自期刊所处的位置。结果表明,近年来的中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)、中文核心期刊、中国科技核心期刊、中国农业(林)核心期刊评选中,27种农业科技期刊入选的数量基本保持稳定,而复合影响因子、综合影响因子和期刊影响力指数(源自《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》)均值总体呈逐年上升趋势,说明该类期刊在持续稳步发展,影响力不断提升。根据最新评价结果,27种农业科技期刊的核心期刊入选率和影响力指标整体上均明显高于全国农业综合类期刊(或平均值),说明该类期刊近些年发展相对较快,影响力在我国综合性农业期刊中处于中上水平。对期刊评选及影响力指标的比较分析结果均表明,期刊间的差距较大,呈现出明显的发展不平衡性,27种农业科技期刊可以划分为6类。

In order to understand the current status of the influence of comprehensive agricultural sci-tech journals sponsored by provincial academies of agricultural sciences in China,based on the selection catalogues of core journals,citation databases and the data of citation reports,the evaluation results of 27 comprehensive and academic agricultural sci-tech journals sponsored by various provincial academies of agricultural sciences were analyzed in recent years and compared with the national comprehensive agricultural journals,to clarify the influence level of this type of journals in the various evaluation of agricultural journals and the position of the respective journals. The results showed that in the selection of China Science Citation Database(CSCD),Chinese Core Journal,China Science and Technology Core Journal,and China Agriculture(Forest) Core Journal in recent years,the selected number of 27 agricultural sci-tech journals basically remained stable,while the average values of the composite impact factor,comprehensive impact factor and clout index(from the Annual Report for Chinese Academic Journal Impact Factors)displayed an upward trend year by year,indicating that this type of journals developed steadily and their influence continued to increase. According to the latest evaluation results,the core journal selection rates and influence indicator values of the 27 agricultural sci-tech journals were significantly higher than the national comprehensive agricultural journals(or their average values),indicating that these journals developed relatively faster in recent years and ranked the upper middle level among the comprehensive agricultural journals. The comparative analysis of journal selection results and influence indicators showed large gap and obvious development imbalance among the 27 journals,which could be divided into six categories.