期刊文献+

Comparison of water resources management between China and the United States 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 As the world’s top two economies,the United States(U.S.)and China face a number of similar water resources problems.Yet,few studies have been done to systematically compare policies and approaches on water resources management between China and the U.S.This study compares water resources policies of China and the U.S.in the areas of national authority,water supply,water quality,and ecosystem use of the water to draw lessons learned and shed light on water resources management in China,the U.S.,and the rest of the world.The lessons learned from the comparison include six aspects.1)New paradigms of people-water harmony and a water-saving society are urgently needed to address the pressing water crisis and achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals(UN SDGs).2)A comprehensive,consistent,forward-looking national policy is necessary to achieve sustainable use of water resources.3)Empowerment of river basin commissions with comprehensive authority over the integrative management of air,land,water,and biological resources in the river basin could significantly enhance the benefits and effectiveness of economic development and environmental protection.4)Expansion of water exchange through market mechanisms among water users promotes efficient and beneficial water uses.5)Use of water for ecosystem services should be an integral part of water resources management.China has set up a national blueprint for achieving ecological civilization;maintaining appropriate amounts of flow in rivers and lakes for maintenance of wildlife and fisheries and ecosystems should be institutionalized as part of this national strategy as well.6)By sharing their rich experiences and lessons in water resources management,economic development,and ecological protection with other countries,China and the U.S.can help the world to achieve global human-water harmony and the UN SDGs.
出处 《Geography and Sustainability》 2020年第2期98-108,共11页 地理学与可持续性(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1夏军,王渺林,王中根,牛存稳,严冬.针对水功能区划水质目标的可用水资源量联合评估方法[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(5):752-760. 被引量:25
  • 2夏军,王中根,严冬,王渺林.针对地表来用水状况的水量水质联合评价方法[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(1):146-153. 被引量:17
  • 3成金华,李世祥,吴巧生.关于中国水资源管理问题的思考[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(6):162-168. 被引量:15
  • 4GWR Integrated Water Resources Management. TAC (Technical Advisory Committee) Background Papers No. 4. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership (GWP), 2000.
  • 5Pratt A, Lonholdt J, Jorgensen P E, Persson B, Nikolov V, Ianev R, Dontchev V, Klint M. Implementing the water framework directive in Bulgaria: integrated river basin management on the Black Sea coast. Water Science and Technology, 2005, 51(11): 53-61.
  • 6Schmedtje U, Weller P. Development of a Danube River Basin Management Plan in Line with the Requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive. London: IWA Publishing, 2005.
  • 7Mohaupt V, Crosnier G, Todd R, Petersen P, Dworak T. WFD and agriculture activity of the EU: first linkages between the CAP and the WFD at EU level. Water Science and Technology, 2007, 56(1): 163-170.
  • 8Szilagyi F, Acs E, Borics G, Halasi-Kovacs B, Juhasz P, Kiss B, Kovacs T, Mfiller Z, Lakatos G, Padisak J, Pomogyi P, Stenger- Kovacs C, Szabp K E, Szalma E, Tothmeresz B. Application of water framework directive in Hungary: development of biological classification systems. Water Science and Technology, 2008, 58(11): 2117-2125.
  • 9Ke L D. China Water Law and Water Management. Beijing: China Water and Hydropower Press, 1998.
  • 10Wouters P, Hu D S, Zhang J B, Tarlock D A, Andrews-Speed E The new development of water law in China. University of Denver Water Law Review, 2004, 7(2): 243 308.

共引文献49

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部