摘要
库恩的范式理论产生了超出科学哲学界的巨大影响。然而,库恩在“范式”定义上的模糊性也招致了大量批评。库恩在晚年放弃了“范式”一词,但为时已晚,他承认“范式”一词已失控。鉴于“范式”一词已成为人们的日常用语,在各领域具有举足轻重的地位,以理性主义立场重新考察该概念及其定义就具有重要意义。库恩在《科学革命的结构》中展现出的矛盾的立场,为反驳相对主义的“范式”定义提供了线索。无论是在范式的诞生还是崩溃阶段,技术实践都发挥着举足轻重的作用。
Kuhn’s paradigm theory has had a great influence beyond the scientific philosophy.However,Kuhn’s vague definition of“paradigm”has also attracted a lot of criticism.It was too late for Kuhn to abandon the word“paradigm”in his later years.He admitted that the word“paradigm”was out of control.Since the word“paradigm”has become a daily term and plays a pivotal role in various fields,it is important to re-examine the concept and its definition from a rationalist standpoint.Kuhn showed a contradictory position in The Structure of the Scientific Revolution,providing clues to refute the definition of“paradigm”of relativism.Technical practice plays an important role in both the birth and collapse of paradigms.
作者
陈石磊
王伯鲁
CHEN Shi-lei;WANG Bo-lu(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第1期83-88,共6页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金
国家社会科学基金高校思政课研究专项项目:“马克思主义科技观的当代内涵及其教学应用研究”(20VSZ126)。
关键词
范式
实验
技术实践
观察
paradigm
experiment
technical practice
observation