期刊文献+

腹横肌平面腹直肌鞘阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊手术中的应用 被引量:4

The application of transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic gallbladder surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析腹横肌平面腹直肌鞘阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊手术中的应用价值。方法选择2019年1月至2020年6月于我院行腹腔镜胆囊手术治疗患者80例,40例予以全麻(全麻组),40例予以腹横肌平面腹直肌鞘阻滞+全麻(阻滞组),比较两种麻醉方式对平均动脉压、心率、术中丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼用量、术后拔除气管导管时间、术后下床时间的影响,并对不良反应发生情况、术后咳嗽时VAS疼痛评分进行比较。结果两组T_(1)时平均动脉压、心率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组T_(2)时平均动脉压、心率有所降低,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组T_(3)时平均动脉压、心率比较,全麻组均高于阻滞组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。全麻组丙泊酚用量为(451.55±90.54)mg,高于阻滞组的(402.25±111.41)mg;全麻组瑞芬太尼用量为(412.64±84.42)μg,高于阻滞组的(365.12±98.11)μg;差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。全麻组术后拔除气管导管时间为(12.31±5.41)min,阻滞组为(12.11±5.92)min,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);全麻组术后下床时间为(21.51±3.74)h,长于阻滞组的(15.32±4.91)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。全麻组不良反应总发生率为37.50%,高于阻滞组的10.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。全麻组术后2、6、12 h咳嗽时VAS评分均高于阻滞组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后24 h咳嗽时VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊手术患者应用腹横肌平面腹直肌鞘阻滞可维持术中循环平稳,为患者提供良好的镇痛效果,减少并发症,促进患者快速康复。 Objective To analyze the application value of transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block(TAPB+RSB)in laparoscopic gallbladder surgery.Methods A total of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were selected,with 40 patients received general anesthesia(the general anesthesia group)and another 40 patients received TAPB+RSB+general anesthesia(the block group).The effects of the two anesthesia methods on mean arterial pressure,heart rate,intraoperative dosage of propofol and remifentanil,postoperative tracheal tube removal time,postoperative time to get out of bed were compared,and the occurrence of adverse reactions and VAS pain score during postoperative cough were compared.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)at T_(1)(P>0.05).The MAP and HR in both groups were reduced at T_(2),without statistically significant differences(P>0.05).The MAP and HR in the general anesthesia group were higher than those in the block group at T_(3),with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The dosage of propofol in the general anesthesia group(451.55±90.54)mg was higher than(402.25±111.41)mg in the block group,and the dosage of remifentanil(412.64±84.42)μg in the general anesthesia group was higher than(365.12±98.11)μg in the block group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The time to remove the tracheal tube after surgery was(12.31±5.41)min in the general anesthesia group and(12.11±5.92)min in the block group,without statistically significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).The time to get out of bed after surgery in the general anesthesia group(21.51±3.74)h was longer than(15.32±4.91)h in the block group,with statistically signifi cant differences(P<0.05).The total incidence of adverse reactions in the general anesthesia group was 37.50%,which was higher than 10.00%in the block group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores for cough at 2,6 and 12 h after surgery in the general anesthesia group were higher than those in the block group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in VAS score for cough at 24 h after surgery(P>0.05).Conclusion The application of TAPB+RSB in pa-tients undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder surgery can maintain smooth intraoperative circulation,provide good analgesic effects for patients,as well as reduce complications and promote rapid rehabilitation of patients.
作者 卢建朴 王传镇 张建辉 李艳媛 LU Jianpu;WANG Chuanzhen;ZHANG Jianhui;LI Yanyuan(Department of Anesthesia,Shishi Hospital in Fujian Province,Shishi 362700,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2021年第36期120-123,共4页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊手术 腹横肌平面腹直肌鞘阻滞 术后下床时间 不良反应 VAS评分 Laparoscopic gallbladder surgery Transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block Time to get out of bed after surgery Adverse reactions VAS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献70

  • 1Elvir-Lazo ,White PF. The role of multimodal analgesiain pain management after ambulatory surgery.Curr Opin An-aesthesiol,2010, 23 (6) : 697-703.
  • 2Wills VL,Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.BrJ Surg, 2000, 87(3); 273-284.
  • 3El-Dawlatly AA,Turkistani A, Kettner SC, et al. Ultra-sound-guided transversusabdominis plane block: descriptionof a new technique and comparison with conventionalsystemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br JAnaesth, 2009,102(6): 763-767.
  • 4Keir A,Rhodes L,Kayal A, et al. Does a transversusabdo-minis plane (TAP) local anaesthetic block improve pain con-trol in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Abest evidence topic.Int J Surg, 2013,11 ?9) : 792-794.
  • 5Wang X,Wang K,Wang B, et al. Effect of oxycodone com-bined with dexmedetomidine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after video-asvsisted thoracoscopic lobec-tomy. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth, 2016, 30(4) : 1015-1021.
  • 6Amri A, Ben A, Chachaty E, et al. Microbiological andphysicochemical stability of oxycodone hydrochloridesolutions for patient-controled delivery systems. J Pain Symp-tom Manage,2010,40(1) :87-94.
  • 7陈健,刘瑞文.腹腔镜胆囊切除手术难度分级的探讨[J].江苏大学学报(医学版),2008,18(6):540-542. 被引量:1
  • 8文霞初,刘晓富,刘亮.胆囊结石成因的研究进展[J].局解手术学杂志,2009,18(1):56-57. 被引量:14
  • 9陈禹.2168例电视腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床观察[J].华西医学,2009,24(8):1952-1954. 被引量:1
  • 10吴述良,杨小宁,沈根法,陶翠萍.小剂量瑞芬太尼在全麻苏醒期的应用[J].东南国防医药,2011,13(1):42-44. 被引量:4

共引文献368

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部