摘要
随着互联网技术的高速发展,互联网不正当竞争行为纠纷案件逐渐成为司法关注焦点。我国现有《反不正当竞争法》未将非类型化竞争行为予以归类,司法裁决通常根据一般条款进行规制。但从历来司法判决来看,不同法院对一般条款的适用规则不一,实践中判断行为是否具有正当性时的判断要素并不统一,缺乏具有普遍适用性的认定框架。对于此类互联网不正当竞争的规制,有必要形成稳固的“竞争利益—竞争关系—竞争损失”分析框架构建不正当认定标准,借助一定的法经济效益理论作为正当性判定的补充标准。
With the rapid advancement of Internet technology,dispute cases of Internet unfair competition behavior have gradually become the focus of judicial attention.The existing“Anti-Unfair Competition Law”in China does not classify non-typed competition behaviors,and judicial rulings are usually regulated in accordance with general clauses.However,judging from historical judicial judgments,different courts have varying application rules and judgment elements for general clauses,and lack a universally applicable determination framework.In view of this,this article believes that for the regulation of Internet unfair competition,it is necessary to form a solid“competitive interests-competitive relationship-competitive loss”analysis framework to construct unfair determination standards,with certain legal economic benefit theory as the supplementary criteria for legitimacy judgment.
作者
阿尔达克·别肯
Aldak Beken(School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050)
出处
《中阿科技论坛(中英文)》
2022年第1期200-205,共6页
China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum