期刊文献+

两种体位支撑用具标准化摆放方法的减压效果评价

The effects of supporting devices placed in a standard way on pressure reduction in two positions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价平卧位和侧卧位两种体位支撑用具标准化摆放方法的减压效果。方法采用自身对照方法,在采取平卧位和侧卧位两种体位的情况下,对40名健康受试者分别采用基于指南形成的支撑用具标准化摆放与常规摆放两种方法,测量受试者与床面接触的身体主要受压部位(枕后、耳廓、肩胛、髋部、骶尾部、膝关节、足跟)的平均压强峰值、压力。结果平卧位及侧卧位支撑用具的常规摆放方法的平均压强峰值均大于基于指南形成的支撑用具标准化摆放方法的平均压强峰值(P<0.001),常规摆放方法的受压点平均压力均大于基于指南形成的支撑用具标准化摆放方法的平均压力(P<0.05)。结论应用基于指南形成的支撑用具标准化摆放方法可以降低受压点压力,但对部分受压部位仍需重点关注。 Objective To evaluate the effects of support devices placed in a standard way on pressure reduction in supine position and lateral decubitus.Methods The study adopted a self-control study design.Forty healthy participants were placed in the supine position and the lateral decubitus respectively with the supporting devices placed in two methods:the standard placement based on the guideline and the routine placement.The average peak pressure and pressure of the main body parts(occipital posterior,auricle,scapula,hip,sacral tail,knee and heel)were measured.Results Routine placement of supporting devices in both positions could produce greater mean peak pressure than the standard placement of supporting devices(P<0.001).Besides,pressure produced by routine placement of supporting devices in both positions was also higher than that of the standard placement of supporting devices(P<0.05).Conclusion The standard placement of supporting devices based on guideline can reduce the pressure of compression body parts.However,some compression parts still need to be paid attention to.
作者 周玉洁 朴玉粉 裴琛 路潜 李蕙杰 杨聪颖 ZHOU Yu-jie;PIAO Yu-fen;PEI Chen;LU Qian;LI Hui-jie;YANG Cong-ying
出处 《中华护理教育》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期70-74,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
基金 北京大学第三医院院种子基金(Y73402-03)。
关键词 指南 体位 压力 支撑用具 Guideline Position Pressure Supporting devices
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献90

共引文献488

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部