期刊文献+

自牵引后离断技术在全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用

Application of self-pulling and latter transection technique in totally laparoscopic radical right colectomy for cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价自牵引后离断技术在全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中应用的安全性。方法:回顾分析2018年2月至2021年9月行全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的75例右半结肠癌患者的临床资料。患者均行全腹腔镜回肠-结肠自牵引后离断Overlap吻合,收集其一般资料、术中情况、术后情况、并发症发生率等。结果:75例患者均顺利完成手术,无中转腹腔外吻合及围手术期死亡病例。手术时间平均(93.4±9.1)min,吻合重建时间(10.3±2.1)min,术中出血量平均(27.5±9.0)mL,术后平均住院(4.9±0.9)d,无吻合口漏等严重并发症发生。其中2例(2.7%)术后出现腹腔感染,经对症治疗后治愈。结论:自牵引后离断技术应用于全腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术安全、可行,值得推广。 Objective:To evaluate the safety of self-pulling and latter transection(SPLT)technique in totally laparoscopic right colectomy of colon cancer.Methods:Seventy-five patients with right colon cancer received SPLT-Overlap anastomosis from Feb.2018 to Sep.2021.The general data,surgical and postoperative outcomes,and complication incidence were collected retrospectively.Results:All 75 operations were successful,there was no extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis and no perioperative mortality.Mean operation duration was(93.4±9.1)min,including(10.3±2.1)min for reconstruction.Mean blood loss was(27.5±9.0)mL,and mean postoperative hospital stay was(4.9±0.9)d.Postoperative complications were found in 2 patients(2.7%),who developed abdominal infection and were cured by the symptomatic treatment.Conclusions:SPLT technique is a safe and feasible procedure in totally laparoscopic right colectomy.It is worthy of promotion.
作者 王健 洪军 王雅平 华鲁纯 蒿汉坤 WANG Jian;HONG Jun;WANG Ya-ping(Department of General Surgery,Huashan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 200040,China)
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2022年第1期52-55,共4页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 结肠肿瘤 右半结肠切除术 腹腔镜检查 自牵引后离断 Colonic neoplasms Right colectomy Laparoscopy Self-pulling and latter transection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献91

  • 1Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991,1:144-150.
  • 2Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, et al. Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg, 2012,256:462-468.
  • 3Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg, 2008,248:1-7.
  • 4Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus (aparoscopicaliy assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013,100:75-821.
  • 5Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol, 2009,10:44-52.
  • 6Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg, 2007, 246:655-662.
  • 7Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopicaily assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004,350:2050-2059.
  • 8Lacy AM, Garcfa-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 359:2224-2229.
  • 9Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol, 2005,6:477-484.
  • 10Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients withcolorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365: 1718-1726.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部