摘要
力图延伸企业创新战略的理论内涵,引入生态视角区分创新战略间交互关系。在中国“放管服”改革背景之下,搭建基于城市政商环境、企业创新战略及创新资源等交互作用的理论框架,采用新兴的研究思路即结合NCA和fsQCA方法,利用组态视角分析企业内外部特征对创新生态绩效的影响路径。研究发现:高资产规模构成高创新生态绩效的必要条件,而其余条件变量均不构成高创新生态绩效的必要条件。同时,高创新生态绩效的产生存在两种组态路径,包括政府对市场的“掠夺之手”下单一创新战略主导型路径和“扶持之手”下的双元创新战略共生型路径。总体上还反映了当政府和市场间的互动由掠夺竞争转变为互利互惠后,两种创新战略的互动从创新生态“失衡”关系转向双元创新生态共生型关系,最终影响高创新生态绩效的产生。
The study tries to extend the theoretical connotation of enterprise innovation strategies.An ecological perspective was applied to distinguish interactive relations among innovation strategies.Theoretical framework was based on government-business environment,innovation strategies,basic resources and their interactions under the reform of government functions.Adopting a new research technique which combines NCA and fsQCA methods,the influence of internal and external characteristics of enterprises on innovation performance is analyzed through configurational perspective.Results show that:High assets scale is a prerequisite for high innovation performance,while the other factors aren't prerequisites.Meanwhile,there are two configurational routes for high innovation performance,including single dominant innovation strategy in“the plundering hand”and dual symbiotic innovation strategies in“the helping hand”.It also reflects when interaction between government and market transforms from predatory competition to mutual benefit,the relationship of innovation strategies changes dynamically from the“imbalanced”state to the dual symbiotic relationship,and finally,two innovation strategies will influence the emergence of high innovation performance.
作者
肖德云
刘俐君
卫武
XIAO Deyun;LIU Lijun;WEI Wu(School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430000, China;School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China)
出处
《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》
2021年第6期79-90,共12页
Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(18AGL006)。
关键词
平衡度
生态交互关系
双元创新
模糊集定性比较分析
degree of balance
ecological interactive relations
dual innovation
fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis