理想还是现实:同案不同判的内在成因和优化路径

Ideal or reality:internal causes and optimization paths of different judgments in the same case

同案判决一直是我国理论法学界颇为关注的话题,近年来,案例指导制度一直是我国司法体制改革工作的重点任务之一,归根结底都属于“同案判决”的指导标准的争论。在实践中,由于多种因素共同复杂作用,“同案不同判①”的情况亦是时有发生,不论是对于理论法学和实践法学来讲,都是对法律稳定性和客观性的巨大挑战。但我国理论界对于同案的认定尚未达成一致。通过对部分案例的关键事实进行分析对比后,不难发现同案不同判形成的共性原因,以及可能对我国司法系统造成的影响。我们可以在此基础上进行积极的引导和规范,正确认识同案同判在我国司法体系中的作用和地位,对于推进我国司法体制改革、完善案例指导制度有着不可替代的重要意义。

CO case judgment has always been a topic of great concern inChina's theoretical and legal circles.In recent years,the case guidance system has always been one of the key tasks of China's judicial system reform.In the final analysis,it belongs to the debate on the guiding standard of"co case judgment".In practice,due to the complex role of many factors,"different judgments in the same case"also occurs from time to time,which is a great challenge to the stability and objectivity of law,both for theoretical law and practical law.However,China's theoretical circles have not reached an agreement on the identification of the same case.Through the analysis and comparison of the key facts of some cases,it is not difficult to find the common reasons for the formation of different judgments in the same case and the possible impact on China's judicial system.On this basis,we can actively guide and standardize,and correctly understand the role and status of the same case and the same judgment in China's judicial system,which is of irreplaceable significance to promote the reform of China's judicial system and improve the case guidance system.