期刊文献+

PHILOS锁定钢板与髓内钉治疗297例肱骨近端骨折患者的疗效对比研究 被引量:7

A comparative study of the clinical effect of PHILOS locking plate and intramedullary nail in the treatment of 297 proximal humerus fracture patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比PHILOS锁定钢板和髓内钉内固定手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年1月期间因肱骨近端骨折于本院骨科行手术治疗的患者297例,根据手术方法分为PHILOS组(n=150)和髓内钉组(n=147),收集患者手术时长,住院总时长,平均切口长度,术中输血率,术后6 h、12 h、24 h、36 h与72 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),院内感染率等围术期相关参数,统计术后6、12、24个月时的Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分与术后并发症发生情况。结果在手术时长、住院总时长、平均切口长度、术中输血率、院内感染率、术后6、12 h VAS、术后肩峰撞击症并发症方面,PHILOS组患者明显高于髓内钉组患者(P<0.05);在术后24、36、72 h VAS、骨折再移位、内固定物断裂、肱骨头坏死并发症、术后6、12、24个月Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分方面,两组患者比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论PHILOS锁定钢板和髓内钉均能在肱骨近端骨折的内固定手术中取得良好术后疗效,但考虑并发症发生、术中操作损伤程度的因素,髓内钉内固定手术更为合适。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of PHILOS locking plate and intramedullary nail in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture.Methods Retrospectively analyzed 297 patients with proximal humeral fracture and suffered surgery in our hospital during the period of January 2015 to January 2019.According to the operation methods patients were divided into PHLIOS group(n=150)and the intramedullary nailing group(n=147).The patient surgery time,the average length of incision,intraoperative blood transfusion rate,pain visual analogue scale(VAS)of postoperative 6 h,12 h,24 h and 36 h and 72 h,the total duration of perioperative nosocomial infection rate and hospitalization time were collected.At the same time,follow-up was conducted,and the Constant-Murley shoulder function score and postoperative complications were collected in 6,12 and 24 months after surgery.Results The length of operation,total length of hospital stay,mean incision length,intraoperative blood transfusion rate,nosocomial infection rate,6 h,12 h postoperative VAS and postoperative acromial impingement complications in the PHILOS group were significantly higher than those in the intramedullary nail group(P<0.05).In terms of the postoperative 24,36,72 h VAS,fracture re-displacement,internal fixation fracture,humeral head necrosis complications,and postoperative Constant-Murley shoulder functional score,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Both PHILOS locking plate and intramedullary nail can achieve good results in the internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures,but considering the complications and the degree of intraoperative injury,intramedullary nail is more appropriate.
作者 陈晓芳 徐琳 刘平 徐洋 Chen Xiaofang;Xu Lin;Liu Ping;Xu Yang(Physical Examination Center,Liyuan Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei,430000;Department of Orthopedics,Liyuan Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei,430000;Health Management Center,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei,430000,China)
出处 《生物骨科材料与临床研究》 CAS 2022年第1期31-35,共5页 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 锁定钢板 髓内钉 内固定 Proximal humerus fracture Locking plate Intramedullary nail Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1魏利,刘财,刘慧勇,温俭,田军.肱骨近端骨折治疗的现状与进展[J].临床骨科杂志,2013,16(1):89-91. 被引量:16
  • 2吴克俭,王晓宁,张建,汤俊君,朱颖波,付中国.肱骨近端骨折[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(4):209-218. 被引量:20
  • 3Edwards SL,Wilson NA, Zhang LQ, et al.Two-part surgical neckfractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanicalevaluation of two fixation techniques[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006, 88(10):2258-2264.
  • 4Konrad G, Audige L, Lambert S, et al. Similar outcomes for nailversus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012,470(2): 602-609.
  • 5Sosef N,Stobbe I, Hogervost M, et al. The Polarus intramedullarynail for proximal humeral fractures : outcome in 28 patients fol-lowed for 1 year[J].Acta Orthop, 2007,78(3) :436-441.
  • 6Giannoudis PV, Xypnitos FN, Dimitriou R,et al.Intemal fixation ofproximal humeral fractures using the polarus intramedullary nail:our institutional experience and review of the literature[J].J Ortho-p Surg Res, 2012, 7(1): 39.
  • 7Nolan NM, Kippe MA, Wiater JM, et al.Surgical treatment of dis-placed proximal humerus fractures with a short intramedullarynail[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(8) : 1241-1247.
  • 8Popescu D, Femandez-Valencia JA, Rios M,et al.Intemal fixationof proximal humerus fractures using the T2-proximal humeral nail[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009,129(9) :1239-1244.
  • 9Brorson S,Frich LH,Winther A,et al.Locking plate osteosynthesisin displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematicreview of benefits and harms[J].Acta 0rthopaedica,2011,4 : 475-481.
  • 10Parmaksizoglu AS,Sokiicu S,Ozkaya U,et al. Locking plate fix-ation of three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures [J]. ActaOrthop Traumatol Turc,2010,44(2): 97-104.

共引文献54

同被引文献66

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部