“社会—技术”争议中“混合论坛”理论的再审视

Reexamination of the“Hybrid Forum”Theory in the Socio-technical Controversy

科技与社会多元化的聚合可能性,引发了世界运作中的不确定性,进而带来了持续性的"社会—技术"争议。鉴于此,卡龙及其合作者提出了"社会—技术"争议中的"混合论坛"理论,试图将经验世界中科学和政治的发展与行动者网络理论(ANT)实现有效结合,以便勾勒出知识创造维度的"共同生产"模式与组织管理层面的"共同治理"机制,进而推进经验世界中既有的科学和政治机构采用对话式的审议制民主来取代代议制民主。然而,由于未能彻底解决专家的"封闭研究"和常民的"野外研究"之间的对称性问题,他们依然从"残留实在论"的立场来仰视公众参与科学。

The possibility of pluralistic convergence of science and technology and society leads to uncertainty in the operation of the world,and then brings about the persistent socio-technical controversy.In view of this,Callon and his collaborators put forward the “hybrid forum” theory in the socio-technical controversy,trying to effectively combine the development of science and politics in the empirical world with the Actor-Network Theory(ANT),so as to outline the “co-production” mode of knowledge creation dimension and the “co-governance” mechanism of organization management level,and further promote the existing scientific and political institutions to adopt deliberative democracy to replace representative democracy.However,they still look up to the “public engagement with science” from the standpoint of “residual realism” because they can not completely solve the problem of symmetry between “secluded research” of specialists and “research in the wild” of laypersons.