数字人文学科归属及其与图情档关系初探

On the Attribution of Digital Humanities and Its Relationship with Library,Information and Archives Management

[目的/意义]在数字人文由单纯的学术热点演化成一门渐进完善的独立学科的同时,关于其学科归属问题并未在学术共同体之间达成共识。[方法/过程]文章从本质目的、内容议题、成果分布、主流趋势四个维度阐述数字人文归属于图书情报与档案管理一级学科的合理性,并以此为基础,厘清数字人文与图书馆学、情报学以及档案学之间的关系,指出四者的核心指向在于知识创新。[结果/结论]文章的最后分别论述了数字人文对于图情档带来的机遇与挑战,并基于“把握机遇,转型升级”和“正面挑战,迎难而上”两个方面针对数字人文与图情档的交叉融合发展提出合理化建议。

[Purpose/significance]While digital humanities has evolved from a simple academic hotspot to a gradually perfect independent discipline,there is no consensus among the academic communities on its discipline attribution.[Method/process]This paper expounds the rationality of digital humanities belonging to the primary discipline of library,information and archives management from four dimensions:essential purpose,content issues,achievement distribution and mainstream trend.On this basis,this paper clarifies the relationship between digital humanities and library science,information science and archival science,and points out that the core direction of the four lies in knowledge innovation.[Result/conclusion]Finally,the paper discusses the opportunities and challenges brought by digital humanities to library,information and archives management,and puts forward reasonable suggestions for the cross integration development of digital humanities and library,information and archives management based on“grasping opportunities,transformation and upgrading”and“confronting challenges,facing difficulties”.