胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸外伤血气胸临床疗效对比

目的对比胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸外伤血气胸的临床疗效。方法选取医院2018年1月至12月收治的胸外伤血气胸患者82例,按手术方式的不同分为对照组和观察组,各41例。对照组采用开胸手术治疗,观察组采用胸腔镜手术治疗,对比两组患者的临床疗效。结果经过治疗,观察组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流时间、止痛药应用时间、住院时间和术后并发症均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论胸腔镜手术治疗胸外伤血气胸的临床疗效显著优于开胸手术。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in the treatment of hemopneumothorax with thoracic trauma.Methods A total of 82 patients with hemopneumothorax due to thoracic trauma treated in the hospital from January to December 2018 were divided into the control group and the observation group,41 cases in each group.The control group was treated with thoracotomy and the observation group was treated with thoracoscopic surgery.The clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative drainage time,analgesic application time,hospital stay and postoperative complications in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of hemopneumothorax with thoracic trauma is significantly better than that of thoracotomy.