摘要
推动中国工程教育研究发展需要从全球工程教育研究发展历程中透视其规律。欧洲工程教育研究的发展经历了兴起、规模化、专门化三个阶段。欧洲"专门化"模式与美国"学科化"模式是工程教育研究朝向制度化发展的两种模式,二者在外部建制和内在标准上存在差异。借鉴欧美工程教育研究发展经验,未来中国工程教育研究应加强制度化建设,重点解决工科教师参与、专门研究机构建立以及内在研究标准建设等问题。
To promote the development of engineering education research in China, we need to perspective its laws from the development process of global engineering education research. The development of engineering education research in Europe has experienced three stages: rise, scale and specialization. European “specialization” model and American “discipline” model are two specific forms of institutionalization of engineering education research, which have both commonalities and individuality. Drawing on the experience of European and American engineering education research and development, China’s engineering education research in the future should strengthen the institutionalization construction, focusing on the participation of engineering teachers, the establishment of special research institutions and the construction of internal research standards.
作者
郭卉
杨佳润
Guo Hui;Yang Jiarun
出处
《高等工程教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第1期194-200,共7页
Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金
2020年教育部人文社科一般项目“中国高校青年学术人才生成的影响因素研究”(20YJA880014)。
关键词
工程教育研究
“专门化”模式
欧洲
美国
engineering education research
“Specialization”mode
Europe
the United States
