期刊文献+

改良Henry入路缝合旋前方肌对桡骨远端骨折功能恢复疗效比较 被引量:10

Comparison of functional recovery of distal radius fracture by suture of pronator muscle through modified Henry approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨桡骨远端骨折改良Henry入路手术治疗中是否缝合旋前方肌对术后前臂功能的影响。方法:自2018年1月至2020年12月采用改良Henry入路切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折患者220例,按照缝合方法不同分为两组,术中缝合组112例,男35例,女77例;年龄37~65(48.5±7.4)岁;骨折AO分型,B型46例,C型66例;骨折复位锁定钢板固定后将切开旋前方肌予以缝合。不缝合组108例,男32例,女76例;年龄34~67(47.6±7.8)岁;骨折AO分型B型41例,C型67例;骨折复位锁定钢板固定后对切开旋前方肌不予缝合,原位铺于钢板表面。分别于术后6周、6个月比较两组腕关节活动范围(旋前、旋后、掌倾、背伸),肩臂手功能障碍评分量表(disability of arm shoulder and hand,DASH)评分和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)。结果:220例患者获得随访,时间6~18(8.5±1.3)个月。术后6周,两组腕关节活动范围、DASH评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6周术中缝合组VAS评分(2.6±1.2)分,与不缝合组(5.8±2.3)分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月两组腕关节活动范围、DASH评分、VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:改良Henry入路缝合旋前方肌在术后腕关节活动范围、上肢功能近期无明显优势,但术中缝合旋前方肌能减少早期术后疼痛,建议术中应缝合旋前方肌。 Objective:To investigate the effect of suture of pronator muscle on forearm function after modified Henry approach for distal radius fractures.Methods:from January 2018 to December 2020,220 patients with distal radius fractures were treated with open reduction and locking plate internal fixation through the modified Henry approach.They were divided into two groups according to different suture methods.There were 112 cases in the intraoperative suture group,including 35 males and 77 females;The age ranged from 37 to 65(48.5±7.4)years;AO classification of fracture,46 cases of type B and 66 cases of type C;After fracture reduction and locking plate fixation,the pronator muscle was opened and sutured.There were 108 cases in the non suture group,32 males and 76 females;The age ranged from 34 to 67(47.6±7.8)years;There were 41 cases of fracture type B and 67 cases of fracture type C;After fracture reduction and locking plate fixation,the open pronator muscle was not sutured,and it was laid on the surface of the plate in situ.The range of wrist motion(pronation,supination,palmar inclination and dorsiflexion),the score of disability of arm shoulder and hand dash and visual analog scale(VAS)were compared between the two groups at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation.Results:All 220 patients were followed up for 6 to 18(8.5±1.3)months.There was no significant difference in the range of motion and DASH score of forearm and wrist between the two groups 6 weeks after operation(P>0.05);There was significant difference in VAS score between suture group(2.6±1.2)and non suture group(5.8±2.3)(P<0.05).Six months after operation,there was no significant difference in the range of motion,DASH score and VAS score of forearm and wrist between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The modified Henry approach has no obvious advantages in the range of wrist movement and upper limb function,but the intraoperative suture of pronator can reduce the early postoperative pain.It is suggested that the pronator should be sutured during the operation.
作者 吴斌 康正阳 魏世坤 熊廷亮 WU Bin;KANG Zheng-yang;WEI Shi-kun;XIONG Ting-liang(The Second Department of Orthopedics,the Second People's Hospital of Panyu of Guangzhou,Guangzhou 511400,Guangdong,China)
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS CSCD 2022年第1期49-53,共5页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(编号:A2017507)。
关键词 桡骨远端骨折 旋前方肌 骨折固定术 Distal radius fractures Pronator quadratus Fracture fixation,internal
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1盛加根,罗从风,曾炳芳.掌侧锁定加压接骨板(LCP)治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(7):657-659. 被引量:50
  • 2池永龙.关于微创骨科技术若干问题的探讨[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(24):1561-1563. 被引量:20
  • 3侯之启,陈铭,戈涛,杨运发,邝炯祥,徐中和.锁定加压接骨板治疗桡骨远端骨折[J].中华手外科杂志,2006,22(4):206-207. 被引量:15
  • 4吴有鲁,冯庆生,丁彩田,张勤中,章武华,费爽明,闻鑫高,林栋,曹华,何利江,董海兵.严重桡骨远端骨折的治疗[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(10):593-594. 被引量:6
  • 5胡庆丰,范顺武,周辉,潘浩.掌侧T形锁定加压接骨板治疗老年桡骨远端骨折[J].中国骨伤,2007,20(4):268-270. 被引量:19
  • 6Lattmann T, Dietrich M, Meier C ,et al. Comparison of 2 surgical approaches for volar locking plate osteosynthesis of the distal radius [ J ]. J Hand Surg Am, 2008,33 (7) : 1135-1143.
  • 7Jupiter JB, Marent-Huber M. Operative management of distal radial fractures with 2.4-millimeter locking plates:a multicenter prospec- tive case series. Surgical technique [J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(Suppl 1 ) :55-65.
  • 8Kamano M, Honda Y,Kazuki K,et al. Palmar plating for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius [J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (397) :403-408.
  • 9Protopsaltis TS, Ruch DS. Volar approach to distal radius fractures [J]. J Hand Surg Am,2008,33(6) :958-965.
  • 10Gwathmey FW Jr,Brunton LM,Pensy RA,et al. Volar plate os- teosynthesis of distal radius fractures with concurrent prophylactic carpal tunnel release using a hybrid flexor carpi radialis approach [J]. J Hand Surg Am,2010,35 (7) : 1082-1088.

共引文献90

同被引文献96

引证文献10

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部