期刊文献+

妨害兴奋剂管理罪的法理诠释 被引量:13

Legal Interpretation of the Crime of Disrupting Anti-Doping Administration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 妨害兴奋剂管理罪的保护法益是"国内、国际重大体育竞赛"的公平性,构成行为表现为针对"运动员使用兴奋剂参加国内、国际重大体育竞赛"实施的"引诱、教唆、欺骗""提供""组织、强迫"等关联行为,这些关联行为可以类型化为(准)支配型、帮助型、强支配型的妨害兴奋剂管理行为。作为故意犯,行为人主观上对规范的构成要件要素必须要有认识,对"兴奋剂"至少要认识到其可能增强运动表现的属性,对"国内、国际重大体育竞赛"要认识到是较大规模竞赛的基础事实,明知"运动员使用兴奋剂参加国内、国际重大体育竞赛"而实施关联行为并且"情节严重"的,即具有可归责性。 The legal interests harmed by the crime of disrupting anti-doping administration is the fairness of a major national or international sports competition.The stereotype of the crime is the behaviors related to the athletes’ using of performance-enhancing drugs when participating in the domestic or international sports competition:for example,inducing,instigating,deceiving,providing,organizing,and forcing athletes to use the forbidden drugs.These related behaviors can be categorized into(quasi) dominance,help,and strong dominance behaviors that disrupt anti-doping administration.As an intentional crime,the actor must have a subjective understanding of the elements of normative constitution.As for the stimulants,the actor needs to recognize its attributes of enhancing the athletic performance,and as for the major national or international sports competition,the actor needs to know the basic facts that it is a large-scale event.Whoever knows the athlete participates into a competition at such a scale by taking performance-enhancing drugs,they are accountable.
作者 魏东 周树超 Wei Dong;Zhou Shuchao
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《法治现代化研究》 2021年第5期78-88,共11页 Law and Modernization
基金 四川省社科重点研究基地四川医事卫生法治研究中心项目“公共卫生事件中公职人员监管渎职犯罪研究”(YF21—Q08)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 妨害兴奋剂管理罪 保护法益 行为定型 可罚的违法性 crimes of disrupting anti-doping administration legal interests stereotypical behavior punishable illegality
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献152

共引文献362

引证文献13

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部