期刊文献+

矢状位参数在颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压植骨融合术治疗3节段脊髓型颈椎病中的价值 被引量:8

The value of sagittal parameters in anterior cervical discectomy decompression and fusion with bone grafting for treatment of three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨矢状位参数在颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压植骨融合术治疗3节段脊髓型颈椎病中的价值。方法采用颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压植骨融合术(ACDF)治疗36例3节段脊髓型颈椎病患者。比较手术前后手术节段角度(SA)、C_(2~7)Cobb角、C_(2~7)矢状位轴向距离(C_(2~7)SVA)和T_(1)倾斜角(T_(1)S),分析手术前后颈椎矢状位参数间及其与颈椎JOA评分的相关性。结果患者均获得随访,时间6~24(12.59±10.21)个月。T_(1)S、C_(2~7)Cobb角、SA、JOA评分术后均较术前明显增加(P<0.05)。C_(2~7)SVA术前与术后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手术前后T_(1)S、C_(2~7)Cobb角、SA、JOA评分相互呈正相关关系(P<0.05)。术前C_(2~7)SVA与术前T_(1)S、C_(2~7)Cobb角、SA、JOA评分无相关关系(P>0.05)。术后C_(2~7)SVA与术后C_(2~7)Cobb角、SA、JOA评分呈负相关关系(P<0.05)。术前与术后颈椎矢状位参数间变化量的相关性分析显示,ΔT_(1)S、ΔC_(2~7)Cobb角、ΔSA与ΔJOA评分相互呈正相关关系(P<0.05),ΔC_(2~7)SVA值与ΔC_(2~7)Cobb角、ΔSA、ΔJOA评分呈负相关关系(P<0.05)。结论ACDF治疗3节段脊髓型颈椎病疗效显著,并且可以加强颈椎各矢状位参数之间的相关性,最终达到恢复颈椎矢状位参数平衡的目的。 Objective To investigate the value of sagittal parameters in anterior cervical discectomy decompression and fusion(ACDF)with bone grafting for treatment of three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM).Methods The 36 patients with three-segment CSM were treated by ACDF with bone grafting.The segmental angle(SA),C_(2~7) Cobb angle,C_(2~7) sagittal vertical axis(C_(2~7) SVA)and T_(1) slope(T_(1)S)were compared before and after operation,and the correlation between cervical sagittal parameters and cervical JOA score was analyzed.Results All patients were followed up for 6~24(12.59±10.21)months.T_(1)S,C_(2~7) Cobb angle,SA and JOA scores were significantly increased than the preoperation(P<0.05).C_(2~7) SVA had no statistical difference with the preoperation(P>0.05).There were mutual positive correlation for T_(1)S,C_(2~7) Cobb angle and SA,JOA score between the preopeation and postoperation(P<0.05).At the preoperation,C_(2~7) SVA was not correlated with preoperative T_(1)S,C_(2~7) Cobb angle,SA,JOA score(P>0.05),while at the postoperation,C_(2~7) SVA was negatively correlated with postoperative C_(2~7) Cobb angle,SA,JOA score(P>0.05).The correlation analysis of the changes of cervical sagittal parameters at the preoperative and postoperative showed thatΔT_(1)S,ΔC_(2~7) Cobb angle,ΔSA andΔJOA score were positively correlated mutually(P<0.05),and the value ofΔC_(2~7) SVA was negatively correlated withΔC_(2~7) Cobb angle,ΔSA andΔJOA score(P<0.05).Conclusions ACDF is effective in the treatment of three-segment CSM,and can strengthen the correlation among the sagittal parameters of cervical spine,and finally achieve the goal of restoring the balance of cervical sagittal parameters.
作者 赵学千 贾象元 李晋玉 陈江 袁林 马慧 孙飞飞 贾育松 ZHAO Xue-qian;JIA Xiang-yuan;LI Jin-yu;CHEN Jiang;YUAN Lin;MA Hui;SUN Fei-fei;JIA Yu-song(SectionⅠ,Dept of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,Dongzhimen Hospital,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China;Dept of Orthopaedics,the Second Affiliated Hospital,Tsinghua University,Tsinghua University Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine,Beijing 100040,China;不详)
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2022年第1期1-6,共6页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
基金 北京中医药大学横向课题(编号:HX-DZM-2017001)。
关键词 3节段脊髓型颈椎病 颈前路减压椎间融合术 矢状位参数 three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy antererior cervical discectomy and fusion sagittal parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献81

  • 1陈宇,陈德玉,王新伟,郭永飞,何志敏.颈椎后纵韧带骨化术后C5神经根麻痹[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(8):572-575. 被引量:20
  • 2Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, et al. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J, 2010,10:469-474.
  • 3Emery SE, Bohhnan HH, Bolesta MJ, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1998, 80: 941-951.
  • 4Lin CN, Wu YC, Wang NP, et al. Preliminary experience with anterior interbody titanium cage fusion for treatment of cervical disc disease. Kaohsiung Med Sci,2003, 19 : 208-216.
  • 5ChenY, Chen D, Guo Y, et al cage: a study based on 300 cases 21:489-492.
  • 6Subsidence of titanium mesh J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, Sasso RC, Ruggiero RA Jr, Reilly TM, et al. Early reconstruction failures after multilevel cervical corpectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28:140-142.
  • 7Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant . Orthopedics, 1988,11:931-934.
  • 8Papadopoulos EC, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2006, 31:897-902.
  • 9Shimamoto N, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26:FA32436.
  • 10Sahjpau| RL. Esophageal perforation from anterior cervical screw migration. Surg Neurol, 2007, 68 : 205-210.

共引文献114

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部