摘要
滥用市场相对优势地位是20世纪市场竞争中早已存在的问题,该行为直接或间接地给市场竞争秩序、交易相对人权益、消费者利益带来了严重损害。世界上已有多个国家的学界、业界、政界对其从不同角度进行了研究探讨,并且以不同的模式立法规制该行为。然而我国内地虽然在制定《反垄断法》时就研讨过这个问题,可目前仍然存在立法空白,原因在于学界、业界对于约束该行为的立法选择上存在很大争议,即究竟是由《反垄断法》还是《反不正当竞争法》规制。因此,本文旨在论证分析该行为在"两反法"中更为合适的位置。
The abuse of market comparative advantage is a problem existing long ago in the market competition in the last century.This behavior has directly or indirectly brought serious damage to the market competition order,the rights and interests of transaction counterparties and the interests of consumers.Academic,industrial and political circles around the world have studied it from different angles,and legislated to regulate the behavior in different modes.However,although this issue has been discussed in the formulation of the Anti Monopoly Law in inland China,there is still a legislative gap at present.The reason is that there is a great controversy in the academia and industry on the legislative choice to restrict this behavior,that is,whether it is regulated by the Anti Monopoly Law or the Law of Against Unfair Competition.Therefore,this paper intends to demonstrate and analyze the more appropriate position of this act in the"two Anti-Laws".
作者
王琲琲
WANG Beibei(Law School,Lanzhou University Lanzhou,Gansu 730000)
出处
《中国商论》
2022年第3期36-39,共4页
China Journal of Commerce
关键词
滥用
相对优势地位
反垄断法
反不正当竞争法
abuse
comparative advantage
Anti Monopoly Law
Law of Against Unfair Competition