期刊文献+

《科利奥兰纳斯》中的国家权力与瘟疫隐喻

National Power and the Metaphor of Plague in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus
原文传递
导出
摘要 《科利奥兰纳斯》中没有直接描写瘟疫的场景,但却暗藏了瘟疫的隐喻——莎士比亚将平民的骚动和叛乱比喻成毁灭城邦的瘟疫。本文通过考证史实发现,在莎士比亚写作的时代,民众聚集引发的危机远胜瘟疫在英国造成的混乱。此剧创作之时,正值新君主詹姆士一世上台,稳固绝对主义封建王权的地位是头等大事。莎士比亚将民众的暴动和骚乱视作社会瘟疫,是国家稳固的大敌。《科利奥兰纳斯》中的瘟疫话语,反映的正是新晋君主对政权稳固的焦虑和担忧。然而,剧中不仅仅体现了这种维护国家权力的话语,莎士比亚也在不经意间为平民开脱,质疑和拷问着"君权神授"的神话。 Without any direct references of plague,Coriolanus is haunted by the metaphor of plague in which Shakespeare compares citizens’turbulence to the plague within.Analysing the historical evidence,the author finds that citizens’riots were more prevalent than the plague at that time.When Shakespeare wrote Coriolanus,James I,who considered national power and stability to be the first agenda of the country,rose to power.Hence,public riots were deemed a plague which would devastate the whole country.However,while Shakespeare’s plague metaphor of plague displays anxiety about safeguading national power,his play also inadvertently excusses the common people and expressses skepticism about the myth of the divine right of kings.
作者 袁方 Fang Yuan(School of Humanities,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing,China)
出处 《外国语言与文化》 2021年第4期21-29,共9页 Foreign Languages and Cultures
基金 国家社科基金后期项目“文化唯物主义与英国马克思主义文学批评”(19FWWB003) 教育部人文社科青年基金“艾伦·辛菲尔德的文化唯物论研究”(20YJC752023) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2021RC64)。
关键词 《科利奥兰纳斯》 瘟疫 国家权力 莎士比亚 Coriolanus plague national power Shakespeare
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Branson,Noreen, and Margot Heinemann. Britain in the Nineteen Thirties. Frogmore: Panther, 1973.
  • 2Graves,Robert, and Alan Hodge. The Long Weekend : A Social History of Great Britain 1918-1939. NewYork: Norton, 1963.
  • 3Heinemann, Margot. “1956 and the Communist Party.” The Socialist Register 13 (1976) : 43-57.
  • 4Heinemann, Margot. “How Brecht Read Shakespeare.” Political Shakespeare : Essays in Cultural Materialism. Ed. JonathanDollimore and Alan Sinfield. Ithaca: Cornell UP,1994. 226-54.
  • 5Heinemann, Margot. “Left Review, New Writing, and the Broad Alliance against Fascism.” Vision and Blueprints : Avant-Garde Culture and Radical Politics in Early Twentieth-Century Europe. Ed. Edward Timms and PeterCollier. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1988. 113-37.
  • 6Heinemann, Margot. “Louis MacNeice, John Cornford and Clive Branson: Three Left-Wing Poets.” Culture and Crisis inBritain in the Thirties. Ed. Jon Clark, et al. London: Lawrence, 1979. 103-32.
  • 7Heinemann, Margot. “The People’s Front and the Intellectuals.w Britain,Fascism and the Popular Front. Ed. Jim Fryrth.London: Lawrence, 1985. 157-85.
  • 8Heinemann, Margot. Puritanism and Theatre : Thomas Middleton and Opposition Drama under the Early Stuarts. Cam-bridge: CUP, 1980.
  • 9Klugmann, James. MIntroduction: The Crisis in the Thirties: A View from the Left.” Culture and Crisisin Britain in the Thirties. Ed. Jon Clark, et al. London: Lawrence, 1979. 13-36.
  • 10Lewis, C_ Day, ed. The Mind in Chains: Socialism and the Cultural Revolution. London: Muller, 1937.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部