摘要
法学研究中的性化语用非常普遍,特别是在法理学文章中性化修辞堪称特色。然而法学界对法律语用的专题研究很少,性化语用没有与定义思维融贯,含糊使用的现象比较突出。但性化语词的模糊性恰可作为意识形态话语工具。对法律的性化修饰及运用,既要看到其积极意义,也要注意其弊端。性化语用一方面会增大对法律本体认识的模糊,另一方面也会提升传播的效率。就提升思维和规范行为来看,对法律的性化语用需要强化定义思维,以便在定性的基础上恰当使用。法治话语体系的塑造,需要确定捍卫法治的性化语词,确定其基本含义和体系要素,探寻要素间的逻辑一致性,找到具体的实施方法。这对改造传统的思维方式的弊端、塑造捍卫法治的法理思维有重要作用。
The Legality and Legalization Pragmatics are very common in study of law,definitely the feature of the Legality and Legalization rhetoric in the articles of jurisprudence.However,there are few special studies on legal pragmatics in the field of law,and the use of Legality and Legalization pragmatics is not consistent with the thinking of definition,and the phenomenon of vague use is more prominent.But the ambiguity of the words of Legality and Legalization can be used as a tool of ideological discourse.We should not only see its positive significance,but also pay attention to its disadvantages in the modification and application of Legality and Legalization of law.The Pragmatics of Legality and Legalization will increase the vagueness of the legal ontology,on the other hand,it will improve the efficiency of communication.In terms of the adjustment of thinking promotion and behavior regulating,the Legality and Legalization Pragmatics of law need to strengthen the thinking of definition so that it can be properly used on the basis of qualitative analysis.To shape the Legal Discourse System,it is necessary to determine the Legality and Legalization words to safeguard the rule of law,determine its basic meaning and elements of system,explore the logical consistency among the elements,and find specific implementation.It plays an important role in reforming the drawbacks of the traditional way of thinking and shaping the jurisprudential thinking to safeguard the rule of law.
出处
《北方论丛》
2022年第1期5-24,共20页
The Northern Forum
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“新兴学科视野中的法律逻辑及其拓展研究”(18ZDA034)。