期刊文献+

中国古代文论研究路径的新省思——以明代文学流派论争研究为例

An New Reflection about the Research Path of the Chinese Classical Literary Theory:Taking the Research about the Debate of Literature Schools in the Ming Dynasty as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国古代文论的学科称谓并不统一,研究宗旨和路径也差异较大。其中最值得重视的,当是中国古代文论在文人主体、文学批评范畴和文学批评方法上的理论体系建构范式。而从明代文学流派论争研究出发,也可以综合揭示文学流派论争对于文学批评空间拓展、文学理论催生和文学批评升华的重要作用。 The subject title of ancient Chinese literary theory is not unified, and the research purposes and paths are also different. Among them, the most worthy of attention is the theoretical system construction paradigm of ancient Chinese literary theory on literati subject, literary criticism category and literary criticism method. Starting from the study of literary school debate in the Ming Dynasty, we can comprehensively reveal the important role of literary schools debate in the space expansion of literary criticism, the birth of literary theory and the sublimation of literary criticism.
作者 张欢 冯小禄 ZHANG Huan;FENG Xiaolu(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming,Yunnan 650500)
出处 《玉溪师范学院学报》 2021年第5期9-14,共6页 Journal of Yuxi Normal University
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“文化身份和文学权力视域下的明代台阁文学研究”(项目编号:18BZW057)阶段性成果。
关键词 中国古代文论 研究路径 流派论争 文学批评空间 Chinese classical literary theory research path literary school debate space of literary criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部