期刊文献+

司法体制改革中繁简分流的优化路径——基于法理学的思维方式与探讨 被引量:1

The optimized path of the diversion of complexity and simplicity in the reform of judicial system--Thinking mode and discussion based on Jurisprudence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着经济的快速发展,我国迎来了社会发展转型的关键时期,各种社会矛盾和经济纠纷也纷至沓来,呈现出爆炸式增长的态势。立案审查制向等级制的改革使得案件进入司法程序的准入门槛被降低,大量案件涌入人民法院。然而现有的员额制法官人数却增加的十分缓慢,案多与人少之间的矛盾愈发明显。因此对案件实行繁简分流、平衡需求与供给之间的巨大落差就显得十分重要。文章从繁简分流的价值论入手,对繁简分流机制的本质进行法理探讨,为繁简分流机制在我国实际运行中破除阻碍及优化路径建言献策,以期建立多元、灵活、公正的繁简分流机制。 With the rapid development of economy and society,China has ushered in the shutdown period of social development and transformation,and all kinds of social contradictions and economic disputes are also coming,showing an explosive growth trend.The reform of the case-filing examination system to the hierarchical system lowers the entry threshold of cases into the judicial process,and a large number of cases flood into the people's courts.However,the number of judges under the existing staffing system is increasing very slowly,and the contradiction between the number of cases and the number of judges is becoming more and more obvious.Therefore,it is very important to balance the huge gap between demand and supply and implement the diversion of complicated and simple cases.In this paper,starting from the axiology of traditional and simple diverting,the essence of traditional and simple diverting mechanism is discussed in legal theory,so as to make suggestions and suggestions for the obstacles faced by the mechanism of traditional and simple diverting in China's actual operation and the effective optimization path,and establish a diversified,flexible and just mechanism of traditional and simple diverting.
作者 陈阳 荣威 CHEN Yang;RONG Wei(School of law,Henan University,Kaifeng 472000,China)
机构地区 河南大学法学院
出处 《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》 2021年第6期70-74,共5页 Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
关键词 司法改革 繁简分流 理论价值 judicial reform complicate-simple division theoretical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献83

  • 1熊秋红.废止劳教之后的法律制度建设[J].中国法律评论,2014(2):247-251. 被引量:9
  • 2张文显.法律文化的结构与功能分析[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1992,14(5):3-10. 被引量:15
  • 3陈效.日本检察审查会制度实施现状评析[J].人民检察,2014(7):69-71. 被引量:10
  • 4《法制日报》2001年4月9日题为“政府败诉拒不执行,法院判决如同废纸”.
  • 5西塞罗.《国家篇法律篇》.北京:商务印书馆,1999年版,第41页.
  • 6贺卫方.《复转军人进法院》[N].南方周末,1998年1月2日.
  • 7.《消费者权益保护法第49条的解释与适用》[N].《人民法院报》,2001年3月29日.
  • 8左卫民等.《合议制度研究》,法律出版社2002年版.
  • 9Harald Koch & Frank Diedlich, Civil Procedure in Germany,C.H.Beck Munchen,1998.p.128.
  • 10拙文.《‘立审分离’管理模式的质疑》.《人民法院报》2001年10月26日.

共引文献717

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部