期刊文献+

新冠肺炎疫情冲击下中朝韩贸易的困境与出路 被引量:1

Dilemma and Outlet of the China and Inter-Korea’s Trade Affected by the COVID-19
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2018年,朝鲜半岛局势出现转圜,然中朝韩三国间贸易却在美朝新型关系建构停滞和新冠肺炎疫情冲击下再次遇冷。2020年的中朝贸易甚至遭遇腰斩式下滑。中朝韩三国间贸易由于贸易结构的不平衡性和贸易基础的脆弱性,多受三国间政治安全事件、国际制裁以及国际或区域突发事件的冲击与左右。我们需要基于马克思主义经济基础决定上层建筑的理论,将朝核问题纳入发展范畴,通过"中朝韩经济走廊"和三边贸易体系的构建来强化三国间的经贸基础和实力,扭转三国间政治安全反作用力强于经济基础决定力的现状,从而带动半岛无核化、半岛和平机制与半岛平衡发展三轨并行。 In 2018,the situation on the Korean Peninsula turned round.However,the trades among China,the DPRK and the ROK suffer cold because of the stagnant construction of new relations between U.S.-DPRK and the affection of COVID-19.The Sino-DPRK trade in 2020 was even cut half.Due to the imbalance of trade structure and the fragility of trade foundation,the trades among China,DPRK and ROK is mostly affected by political security incidents,international sanctions and international or regional emergencies.These three countries need to put the Korean nuclear issue into the development category based on the Marxism theory that the superstructure is determined by the economic basis.The construction of“China-DPRK-ROK economic corridor”and trilateral trade system will strengthen the economic and trade foundation among these three countries,reverse the situation that the reaction force of political security among these three countries is stronger than the decisive force of economic foundation,so as to promote the tri-track parallel of denuclearization of the peninsula,peace mechanism of the peninsula and balanced development of the peninsula.
作者 朱芹 Zhu Qin
出处 《韩国研究论丛》 2021年第1期207-222,共16页 Chinese Journal of Korean Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助课题“海洋命运共同体视域下中韩海洋划界问题研究”(项目编号:20FGJB003) 复旦大学亚洲研究中心项目的阶段性成果。
关键词 国家间贸易 国际制裁 新冠肺炎疫情 “一带一路”倡议 “中朝韩经济走廊” Trade of Inter-countries International Sanction The COVID-19 The Belt and Road Initiative “China-DPRK-ROK Economic Corridor”
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献77

  • 1陈龙山.中朝经济合作对朝鲜经济的影响[J].当代亚太,2006(1):23-28. 被引量:9
  • 2Daniel W. Drezner, The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 10-11.
  • 3Robert A. Pape, "Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work," International Security, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1997, pp. 90-91.
  • 4David Cortrlght and George A. Lopez, et al., The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000, pp. 15-17.
  • 5Andrew Mack and Asif Khan, "The Efficacy of UN Sanctions," Security Dialogue, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 279-292.
  • 6Daniel W. Drezner, The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations, pp. 18-21.
  • 7Jon Hovi, Robert Huseby, and Detlef F. Spfinz, "When Do (Imposed) Economic Sanctions Work?" World Politics, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2005, pp. 479-499.
  • 8A. Cooper Drury, Economic Sanctions and Presidential Decisions: Models of Political Rationality, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 28-29.
  • 9David Cortright and George A. Lopez, et al., The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s, pp. 204-208.
  • 10Robert A. Pape, "Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work," pp. 99-101.

共引文献19

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部