期刊文献+

传播修辞学的问题域及其研究范式 被引量:14

Rhetoric Studies in Communication: Research Domain and Paradigms
原文传递
导出
摘要 传播学的"身体"里,一直都流淌着其他学科的血液,而修辞学则是其中最古老的学术传统。修辞学与传播学的"相遇",诞生了一个新兴的学科领域——传播修辞学。不同于修辞传播学的实践取向特征,传播修辞学强调立足修辞认识论这一逻辑原点,赋予传播研究一种修辞视角,将传播问题置于修辞学的知识脉络中加以考察,以此拓展并重构传播研究的修辞学范式。传播修辞学研究的理论路径之一就是聚焦于传播活动的相关要素和环节,分别探讨其来自修辞学的研究视角及其打开的知识话语。相应地,修辞动机问题、修辞情景问题、修辞美学问题、修辞传播问题、修辞语法问题、修辞批评问题构成了传播修辞学研究的六大核心问题域。 Historically, communication has drawn on many academic disciplines, of which rhetoric is the oldest one. Different from rhetoric communication which makes its exploration on the dimension of practice, rhetoric studies in communication develops into a new research field by re-contextualizing communication studies in rhetoric perspective and thus reconstructing its rhetoric paradigms. Focusing on the specific elements and processes of communication activities, rhetoric studies in communication explores the academic resources and the intellectual discourse they open. Its main research domain accordingly consists of rhetorical motive, rhetorical situation, rhetorical aesthetics, rhetorical communication, rhetorical grammar, and rhetorical criticism.
作者 刘涛 Liu Tao
出处 《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期91-105,共15页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“视觉修辞的理论、方法与应用研究”(17ZDA290)的阶段性成果。
关键词 传播修辞学 修辞传播学 学术传统 问题域 修辞视角 rhetoric studies in communication rhetorical communication academic tradition research domain rhetoric perspective
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献86

  • 1Milstein, T., "Environmental Communication Theories," in S. Littlejohn & K. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009, p. 344.
  • 2Stamm, K.R., " Environment and Communication, in F. Gerald Kline and Phillip J. Tichenor (Eds.) , Current Perspectives in Mass Communication Research, vol. 1, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1972, pp. 265-294.
  • 3Schoenfeld, C. , "Irruption in Environmental Communications," American Forests, October, 1972, pp. 20-22, 52-55.
  • 4Luhmann, N. , Ecological Communication (J. Bednarz, Trans. ) , Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
  • 5Schoenfeld, C.A. , Interpreting Environmental Issues : Research and Development in Conservation Communications, Madison, WI: Dembar Educational Research Services, 1972.
  • 6Cox, J.R. , " Beyond frames: Recovering the Strategic in Climate Communication," Environmental Communication, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010, pp. 122 - 133.
  • 7Ostman, R.E., & Parker, J.L., "A Public's Environmental Information Sources and Evaluations of Mass Media," The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 1987, pp. 9 - 17.
  • 8Peters, R.G., Covello, V.T., & McCallum, D. Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: vo1.17, no.l, 1997, pp. 43-54. B., " The Determinants of Trust and An Empirical Study," Risk Analysis,.
  • 9Scholz, R. W. , & Binder, C.R., Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions, London: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • 10Schwarze,S., " Environmental Communication as a Discipline of Crisis," Environmental Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, 2007, pp. 87-98.

同被引文献145

引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部