常规治理与运动式治理的纵向协同机制

The Vertical Coordination Mechanism of Conventional Governance and Campaign-style Governance

以“同乡同业”型电信诈骗为例,从公共事务属性的角度出发,对常规治理和运动式治理之间的关系进行了研究。“同乡同业”型电信诈骗是一种源头集中性跨界事务,存在集中的源头地和分散的结果地的空间跨界,但又缺乏明晰的跨界边界,具有非规则性。常规治理从分散的结果地入手展开,存在结果地治理和集中性源头地的空间错位,导致治理的高成本。运动式治理则从集中的源头地一端展开治理,实现了治理主体和治理对象的对位治理。常规治理和运动式治理相协同形成了过滤层和补充层的双层治理,二者既具有独立价值又具有互补性和递进性,是纵向协同的关系。“双层治理”解释框架是对运动式治理的一种类型化理解,能为更一般化的理论提炼奠定基础。

Taking the“Townsmen and peers”telecom fraud as an example,the relationship between conventional governance and sports governance is studied from the perspective of the attributes of public affairs.The“townsmen and peers”type of telecom fraud is a cross-border affair with a centralized source.There are spatial cross-borders between a centralized source and a scattered result,but it lacks a clear cross-border boundary and is irregular.Conventional governance starts with decentralized results,and there is a spatial dislocation of results-based governance and centralized sources,leading to high costs of governance.Campaign-style governance starts from the end of the centralized source,and realizes the aligning governance between the governance subject and the governance object.Conventional governance and campaign-style governance form a two-tier governance of filtering layer and supplementary layer.The two have their own independent value,complementarity and progressiveness,and are a vertical synergy relationship.The understanding of campaign-style governance is only one of the types,which can lay the foundation for more general theoretical refinement.