期刊文献+

区间互补判断矩阵一致性水平修正的离散化方法

Discretization method to improve the consistency level for interval reciprocal preference relation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高决策信息的可靠性,提出了一种改进区间互补判断矩阵个体一致性水平的离散调整方法.首先,针对互补判断矩阵给出一种启发式迭代算法用来识别、修改最不一致的偏好元素,改进其一致性水平.然后,基于最差一致性指标和最优一致性指标,把区间互补判断矩阵的一致性水平改进方法转化为两类互补判断矩阵的一致性水平改进方法.修正后的偏好取值属于最初的离散标度集,更易被决策者所接受.最后,通过与已有方法的对比分析,验证了所提出方法的有效性和适用性. In order to enhance the credibility of decision information,this paper proposes a discrete adjustment method for improving the consistency level of interval reciprocal preference relation.Firstly,a heuristic iterative algorithm is given to identify and modify the most inconsistent judgments for reciprocal preference relation,improving its individual consistency level.Secondly,based on the worst consistency index and the best consistency index,the consistency level improvement method for interval reciprocal preference relation is reduced to the method for improving the consistency levels of two types of reciprocal preference relations.The revised preferences belong to the original discrete evaluation scale,which are more acceptable by the decision makers.Finally,the validity and applicability of the proposed approaches are verified by comparative analysis with the existing methods.
作者 吴志彬 陈雪 徐玖平 Wu Zhibin;Chen Xue;Xu Jiuping(Business School,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)
机构地区 四川大学商学院
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期754-765,共12页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971148,71671118).
关键词 区间互补判断矩阵 最优一致性指标 最差一致性指标 一致性改进 个体偏好 interval reciprocal preference relation the best consistency index the worst consistency index consistency improvement individual preference
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1孙昭旭,邱菀华,韩敏.一种模糊判断矩阵的互补一致性修正方法[J].系统工程,2005,23(4):101-104. 被引量:10
  • 2Tanino T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making [J]. Fuzzy Sets and System , 1984, 12: 117-131.
  • 3Switalski Z. Transitivity of fuzzy p reference relations-an empirical study[J]. Fuzzy Sets and System , 2001, 118: 503-508.
  • 4Xu Zeshui, Wei Cuiping. A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,116 : 443- 449.
  • 5Finan J S, Hurley W J. The analytic hierarchy process: does adjusting a pairwise comparison matrix to improve the consistency ratio help [J]. Computers Ops Res, 1997, 24(8): 749-755.
  • 6Pelaez J I , Lamata M T. A new measure of consis tency for positive reciprocal matrices[J]. Comput ers and Mathematics With Applications, 2003(46): 1840-1845.
  • 7Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H. Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preference and fuzzy majority [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1992, 49 : 21-31.
  • 8Nurmi H, An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with Linguistic quantifiers [J]. Decision Support Systems, 1988(4) : 313-327.
  • 9Romero C. Extended lexicographic goal programruing: a unifying approach [J]. Omega, 2001, 29: 63-71.
  • 10Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F. Multiperson decision-making based on multiplieative preference relations [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129: 372-385.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部