期刊文献+

论我国药物临床试验侵权责任存在的问题及完善 被引量:1

Problems and Improvement of Tort Liabilities for Drug Clinical Trials in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国关于药物临床试验侵权责任的立法相对滞后,既没有针对药物临床试验的专门立法,也没有在《民法典》中予以规定,导致在司法实践中处理该类纠纷时,适用法律不一,选择原则各异。为了更好地规范这类行为,可以在借鉴他国立法经验的基础上,根据我国实际制定专门的《人体医学试验法》,完善《民法典》侵权责任编。通过在司法实践过程中适用“盖然性因果关系”、以“法定行为标准”判断过错、严格免责事由等措施来保护试药者的合法权益。 There is a lag in the legislation on tort liabilities for drug clinical trials in China,and it is shown that there is neither any special legislation on drug clinical trials nor any provision concerning it in The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China.Consequently,various legal provisions and principles are applied in the judicial practice concerning the disputes of tort liabilities for drug clinical trials.To regulate the drug clinical trials in a better way,it is sensible to formulate The Act of Human Medical Test and modify provisions in“the Section of Tort Liabilities”in The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China by making reference to corresponding legislation abroad and based on actual circumstances in China.Thereafter,the principle of probable causality,the legal act standard in deciding fault and being strict with the subject matter of exemption should be applied in judicial practice,aiming to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the subjects of the clinical trials.
作者 邱玉枚 何婕 QIU Yumei;HE Jie(Law School, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;School of Marxism, Changsha Social Work College, Changsha 410004, China)
出处 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第1期36-41,共6页 Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
基金 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“互联网保险的法律规制研究”(18SFB3036)。
关键词 药物临床试验 侵权责任 路径 drug clinical trial tort liability approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1马芊.医疗侵权责任若干问题研究[J].科技资讯,2007,5(26):236-237. 被引量:1
  • 2李自庆.人体试药,法律漏了一把“锁”——国内首例试药人状告试药方索赔案透析[J].观察与思考,2006(18):36-39. 被引量:3
  • 3陈炜.无过错责任原则在临床试验受试者保护中的适用[J].西北医学教育,2006,14(5):536-538. 被引量:12
  • 4林洁琛,杨利宏,赵刚.海宁“跨国人体试药命案”调查[N].中国经营报,2005-05-21.
  • 5上海东方医院人工心脏手术诉讼牵出外国机构在华医学人体试验疑云[N].南方都市报,2007-07-25.
  • 6The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research,The Belmont Report [ M ] i Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1978.
  • 7Paul M. McNeill, The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation [ M ]. Cambridge, New York & Melbourne : Cambridge University Press, 1993: 127.
  • 8E. Haavi Morreim, Medical Research Litigation and Malpractice Tort Doctrines: Courts on a Learning Curve [ J ] . Houston Journal of Healthlaw & Policy, 2003, (4).
  • 9Henry Campbell Black, Black' s Law Dictionary (4th Edition) [ M ]. St. Paul : West Publishing Co. , 1968 : 193.
  • 10President' s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Be- havioral Research, Making Health Care Deci- sions—A Report on the Ethical and Legal Impli- cations of Informed Consent in the Patient - Practitioner Relationship [ M ]. Washington : U. S. Government Printinz Office, 1982 : 71.

共引文献19

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部