摘要
诉前程序与诉讼程序既相互独立,又紧密衔接,在公益诉讼案件中起着督促和过滤的作用。但是目前我国公益诉讼还处在发展初期,行政公益诉讼诉前程序在实践运用中的诸多弊端也逐渐暴露出来:案件线索来源太过单一、行政机关履职标准不明确、检察建议的相关规定不完善等。以行政公益诉讼制度中的诉前程序为研究对象,通过梳理相关法律规定,并结合其实践情况,探讨诉前程序在环境行政公益诉讼中存在的问题,从而针对性地提出完善建议。面对环境行政公益诉讼诉前程序逐渐显露出来的不足之处,我们需要进一步完善检察建议的相关规定、鼓励公众参与、设立弹性的履职期限以及明确行政机关的履职标准,最大限度地发挥诉前程序在环境生态保护方面的作用。
The pre-litigation procedure and the litigation procedure are independent of each other and closely linked,which play a role of supervision and filtering in public interest litigation cases.However,public interest litigation in China is still in the early stage of development,and many shortcomings in the practice of preliminary procedures for administrative public interest litigation are gradually exposed:the source of clues in the case is too single,the performance standards of administrative agencies are not clear,and the relevant provisions suggested by procurators are not perfect.This article took the pre-litigation procedure in the administrative public interest litigation system as the research object,through combing the relevant legal provisions and combining with its practice,discussed the existing problems in the pre-litigation procedure of environmental administrative public interest litigation,and put forward targeted suggestions to improve it.Faced with the deficiencies gradually revealed in the prelitigation procedures of environmental administrative public interest litigation,we need to further improve the relevant provisions recommended by the procurator,encourage public participation,set up flexible performance periods,and clarify the performance standards of administrative agencies,so as to maximize the role of pre-litigation procedures in environmental ecological protection.
作者
缪颖
MIAO Ying(College of Law,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China)
出处
《四川环境》
2022年第1期240-244,共5页
Sichuan Environment
关键词
环境行政公益诉讼
诉前程序
检察建议
Environmental administrative public interest litigation
pre-litigation procedure
prosecution recommendations