期刊文献+

基于SciMAT的国际译学动态演化(2010—2019)分析研究 被引量:2

An Analysis of the Dynamic Evolution in International Translation Studies Based on SciMAT(2010-2019)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以Web of Science中10种高影响因子的国际翻译学权威期刊2010—2019年刊登的学术论文的关键词为研究对象,使用科学计量工具SciMAT对2010—2011年、2012—2013年、2014—2015年、2016—2017年、2018—2019年五个时段的研究主题及其动态演化过程进行可视化图谱分析。研究预测"语言""知觉""经验"和"警察访谈"主题是未来的研究热点,归纳出包括"语言→口译员→角色→语言→语言、辅助、手语"在内的九条主题演化路径,由此判断国际翻译学研究主题呈现出从聚焦主流到关注边缘、从结果到过程、从单模态到多模态的演化趋势。 Using the key words in the articles of 10 high-impact journals in international translation studies indexed in the Web of Science as data,this paper makes an in-depth scientometric visualization analysis of the dynamic evolution of the research subjects during the five periods of 2010-2011,2012-2013,2014-2015,2016-2017 and 2018-2019 by employing the scientometric tool SciMAT.This article predicts that such research subjects as LANGUAGE,PERCEPTIONS,EXPERIENCE,POLICE-INTERVIEW will be future research hotspots.Nine evolution paths of research subjects including“LANGUAGE→INTERPRETER→ROLE→LANGUAGE→LANGUAGE,AID,SIGNED-LANGUAGE”are concluded to summarize that the research subjects of international translation studies are experiencing the parallel development with the following evolution trends:from main streams to peripheries,from products to processes,from mono-modality to multimodality.
作者 李文婷 祝朝伟 LI Wenting;ZHU Chaowei
出处 《外国语文》 北大核心 2022年第1期123-132,共10页 Foreign Languages and Literature
关键词 SciMAT 国际翻译学 动态演化 科学计量工具 SciMAT international translation studies dynamic evolution a scientometric tool
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献76

  • 1刘宓庆.翻译理论研究展望[J].中国翻译,1996(6):2-7. 被引量:46
  • 2许钧.一门正在探索中的科学[J].中国翻译,1996(1):3-5. 被引量:33
  • 3王向远.以“迻译/释译/创译”取代“直译/意译”——翻译方法概念的更新与“译文学”研究[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,44(5):132-142. 被引量:29
  • 4刘军.整体网分析讲义--UCINET软件应用:第二届社会网与关系管理研讨会[C].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学社会学系,2007:111.
  • 5Cobo M.J, L6pez-Herrera A.G, Herrera-Viedma E etal. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(7):1382-1402.
  • 6Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, et al. Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses[J].he Journal of the Federation of American .Societies for Experimental Biology, 2008, 22(2):338-342.
  • 7Garfield, E. Scientography: Mapping the tracks of science[J]. Current Contents: Social and Behavioural Sciences,1994, 7(45), 5-10.
  • 8Cobo M J, Lopez-Herrera A.G, Herrera-Viedma.E. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool[J]. 2012, 63(8):1609-1630.
  • 9Kandylas V, Phines Upham S, Ungar L H. Analyzing knowledge communities using foreground and background clusters[J]. ACMTransaetions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2008, 4(2)1-34.
  • 10Chen, C, Ibekwe-SanJuan F, Hou J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple- perspective cocitation analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61 (7): 1386-1409.

共引文献224

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部