期刊文献+

多元评价在中学教学中的可视化探究——关于深化新时代教育评价改革的思考与实践

Visual Exploration of Multiple Evaluation in Middle School Teaching——Thoughts and Practice on Deepening the Reform of Educational Evaluation in the New Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章聚焦增值评价,将学生当前的学习情况与过去进行比较,通过对学生学习起点、过程与结果的共同关注,基于学生个体的进步进行评价,探索结果评价中的增值评价。同时探索普适性较强的多元评价可视化诊断报告单,讨论如何在多元评价中充分尊重学生个体差异,帮助学生正确认识自己、激发学习内驱力,为自我发展赋能。 This paper focuses on value-added evaluation,comparing the current learning situation of students with the past,evaluating the individual progress of students based on the common concern of the starting point,the process and the results of students’ learning,and exploring the value-added evaluation in the outcome evaluation.At the same time,it also provides a set of visual diagnosis reports of multiple evaluation with strong universality,and explores how to fully respect the individual differences of students in multiple evaluation,so as to help students understand themselves correctly,stimulate the internal motivation of learning,and empower their self-development.
作者 余彩芳 YU Caifang(Beijing National Day School,Beijing 100039,China)
机构地区 北京市十一学校
出处 《教育参考》 2022年第1期27-33,共7页 Education Approach
基金 2019年度北京市教育科学“十三五”规划一般课题“新高考背景下学生学业诊断模式和成绩分析方式的探索”(课题编号:CDDB19236)的研究成果之一。
关键词 增值评价 多元评价 数据可视化 Value-added Evaluation Multiple Evaluation Data Visualization
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1马晓强,彭文蓉,萨丽·托马斯.学校效能的增值评价——对河北省保定市普通高中学校的实证研究[J].教育研究,2006,27(10):77-84. 被引量:102
  • 2Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness [M]. Oxford : Pergamon, 1997. 35.
  • 3OECD. Measuring Improvements in Learning Outcomes : Best Practices to Assess the Value-added of Schools [M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.169,1-6.
  • 4Snjd.rs, T., & Bosker, R. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling [M]. London: SAGE, 2012. 48,65.
  • 5Schmidt, W. H., et al. Value-added Research: Right Idea but Wrong Solution? [A]. R. Lissitz. Value-added Models in Education: Theory and Applications [C]. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press, 2005.
  • 6Briggs, D. C., et al. The Sensitivity of Value-added Modeling to the Creation of a Vertical Score Scale [Z]. Paper Presented at the National Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24, 2008.
  • 7Ballou, D., et al. Controlling for Student Background in Value Added Assessment of Teachers [J]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004, ( 1 ).
  • 8Peng, P. and Klieme, E. One-year Value-added School Effects from Various Models and Their Inter-temporal Variability: Evidence from China [Z]. Paper Presented at the Conference: Improving Education through Accountability and Evaluation: Lessons from around the World. Rome, Italy. October 1-3. 2012.
  • 9Thomas, S., et al. Stability and Consistency in Secondary Schools' Effects on Students' GCSE Outcomes over Three Years [J]. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1997, (8).
  • 10Van de Grill, W. Reliability and Validity in Measuring the Value Added of Schools [J].School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2009, (2).

共引文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部