期刊文献+

急诊脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗策略临床实施依从性的观察 被引量:10

Compliance of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解淮安地区急诊脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗策略实施依从性。方法对2020年1月1日至12月31日淮安急诊专科联盟中7家医院急诊中心收治的116例急诊脓毒性休克患者,行1 h集束化治疗策略实施依从性的前瞻性观察。脓毒性休克诊断符合脓毒症3.0诊断标准。结果研究期间共有283例急诊患者符合纳入标准,根据排除标准排除167例。在纳入的116例急诊脓毒性休克患者中,17.2%(20/116)患者1 h内监测乳酸、17.2%(20/116)使用抗菌药物前留取了血培养、70.1%(82/116)使用了抗菌药物、13.8%(16/116)液体复苏晶体液≥30 ml/kg以及49.1%(57/116)复苏过程中使用了血管活性药物。116例中,1 h集束化治疗策略完全执行者13例(11.2%,完全执行组),未完全执行者103例(未完全执行组)。与未完全执行组相比,完全执行组的液体复苏量明显增加[33.7(30.0,37.5)比8.9(7.3,10.8)ml/kg,Z=-4.78,P<0.001],平均动脉压明显升高[70.0(70.0,76.7)比67.7(61.7,76.7)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),Z=-2.00,P<0.001],血乳酸水平明显降低[3.0(2.0,3.2)比4.4(3.7,7.2)mmol/L,Z=-2.76,P=0.006]。收入重病医学科(ICU)者完全执行组9例、未完全执行组71例,两组ICU病死率[4/9比50.7%(36/71)]、住院病死率[4/13比43.7%(45/103)]和28 d病死率[4/13比44.4%(48/103)]比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论急诊脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗策略实施依从性差,需加强相关质量管理培训。 Objective To investigate the implementation status of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department.Methods A total of 116 septic shock patients admitted to the emergency department from January 2020 to December 2020 were included in this prospective study,and the implementation of sepsis bundles and the clinical outcomes of patients were recorded.Results Among 116 patients,20 cases(17.2%)had lactic acid monitored within 1 h,20 cases(17.2%)had blood culture before antibiotics,82 cases(70.1%)received broad-spectrum antibiotics,16 cases(13.8%)received fluid resuscitation≥30 ml/kg,and 57 cases(49.1%)received vasoactive drugs during resuscitation.Finally,the sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy was fully implemented only in 13 cases(11.2%).Compared with the group with incomplete implementation of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy,the volume of fluid recovery in the group with full implementation was significantly increased[33.7(30.0,37.5)vs.8.9(7.3,10.8)ml/kg,Z=-4.78,P<0.001],mean artery blood pressure significantly increased[70.0(70.0,76.7)vs.67.7(61.7,76.7)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),Z=-2.00,P<0.001],and lactic acid significantly decreased[3.0(2.0,3.2)vs.4.4(3.7,7.2)mmol/L,Z=-2.76,P=0.006].However,there were no significant differences in ICU mortality,in-hospital mortality and 28-day mortality between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Septic shock patients in emergency department have poor compliance with the implementation of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy,and relevant management training should be strengthened.
作者 徐亮 高志伟 吴魏芹 于亚东 郭维军 李起 赵长明 陈玉军 王司伟 赵红梅 孙虹 张劲松 Xu Liang;Gao Zhiwei;Wu Weiqin;Yu Yadong;Guo Weijun;Li Qi;Zhao Changming;Chen Yujun;Wang Siwei;Zhao Hongmei;Sun Hong;Zhang Jinsong(Department of Emergency Medicine,Huai'an First People's Hospital,Nanjing Medical University,Huai'an 223300,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,Lianshui People's Hospital,Huai'an 223400,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,Huaiyin Hospital,Huai'an 223300,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,Huai'an Hospital,Huai'an 223200,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,Xuyi People's Hospital,Huai'an 211700,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,Shuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Suqian 223600,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,the Affiliated Shuyang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical Umiversity,Suqian 223600,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210000,China)
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2022年第1期42-47,共6页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
基金 2019年度淮安市卫生健康科研立项项目(HAWJ201905)。
关键词 休克 脓毒性 脓毒症1小时集束化治疗策略 急救医疗服务 依从性 Shock,septic Sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy Emergency medical services Adherence
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1Rivers E,Nguyen B,Havstad S,et al.Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock[J].N Engl J Med,2001,345(19):1368-3677.
  • 2Dellinger RP,Carlet JM,Masur H,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock[J].Crit Care Med,2004,32(3):858-873.
  • 3Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Carlet JM,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J].Crit Care Med,2008,36(1):296-327.
  • 4Jones AE,Saak K,Kline JA.Performance of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score for predicting hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J].Am J Emerg Med,2008,26(6):689-692.
  • 5Angus DC,Linde-Zwirble WT,et al.Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States:analysis of incidence,outcome,and associated costs of care[J].Crit Care Med,2001,29(7):1303-1310.
  • 6Rivers EP.Point:adherence to early goal-directed therapy:does it really matter? Yes.After a decade,the scientific proof speaks for itself[J].Chest,2010,138(3):476-480.
  • 7Schmidt GA.Counterpoint:adherence to early goal-directed therapy:does it really matter? No.Both risks and benefits require further study[J].Chest,2010,138(3):480-483.
  • 8Marik PE,Varon J.Early goal-directed therapy:on terminal life support[J].Am J Emerg Med,2010,28(2):243-245.
  • 9Mikkelsen ME,Gaieski DF,Goyal M,et al.Factors associated with nonadherence to early goal-directed therapy in the ED[J].Chest,2010,138(3):551-558.
  • 10Lyon RM,McNally SJ,Hawkins M,et al.Early goal-directed therapy:can the emergency department deliver[J].Emerg Med J,2010,27(5):355-358.

共引文献29

同被引文献88

引证文献10

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部