期刊文献+

CYP2C19基因导向的抗血小板药物治疗方案在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的经济学评价 被引量:2

Economic evaluation of CYP2C19 genetic test guiding antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:从药物经济学角度评价拟行介入手术的急性冠脉综合征患者依据CYP2C19基因指导抗血小板药物应用的可行性。方法:采用回顾性分析,选取皖南医学院弋矶山医院2018年4月至2020年4月收治的513例采用氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林或替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林进行抗血小板治疗的急性冠脉综合征住院患者,根据是否进行CYP2C19基因检测及个体化用药指导,非随机分为个体化治疗组和采用氯吡格雷标准剂量的常规治疗组。成本仅包括直接医疗成本,效果指标采用患者1年内发生主要心血管不良事件次数,进行增量成本效果分析和敏感性分析。结果:个体化治疗组(n=312)的人均总治疗费用为49319元,常规治疗组(n=201)为51820元;1年内再入院率个体化治疗组为12.18%,常规治疗组为21.89%,具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。增量成本效果比为257.5元/%,相比常规治疗组,个体化治疗组每使100个患者中减少1例因发生主要心血管不良事件再入院,可少花费25750元,表明个体化治疗策略具有明显的成本-效果优势。敏感性分析表明,提高用药效果对增量成本效果比的改变并不十分显著,提示医疗费用才是影响基因检测经济性的关键因素。结论:通过CYP2C19基因检测指导的抗血小板治疗方案对急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后预防主要心血管不良事件具有良好效果,并具有明显成本-效果收益,更具有药物经济学优势。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of using antiplatelet drugs according to CYP2 C19 gene in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing interventional surgery from the perspective of pharmacoeconomics.METHODS A total of 513 hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes who received antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel combined with aspirin or ticagrelor combined with aspirin in our hospital from April 2018 to April 2020 were selected by retrospective analysis.They were non-randomly divided in to the conventional treatment group in which the standard dose of clopidogrel was used for genetic testing according to whether CYP2 C19 gene detection was performed or not.The costs only included direct medical cost,and the effect measure used the number of adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year for incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and sensitivity analysis.RESULTS The per capita total treatment cost of the individualized treatment group(n=312)was 49319 yuan,and the conventional treatment group(n=201)was 51820 yuan.The readmission rate within 1 year was 12.18%in the individualized treatment group,21.89%in the conventional treatment group,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 257.5 yuan/%,and compared with the conventional treatment group,the cost of major cardiovascular adverse events in patients in the individualized treatment group decreased by 25750 per case.The sensitivity analysis showed that the change of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was not very significant,suggesting that medical cost is the key factor affecting the economy of gene testing.CONCLUSION The antiplatelet therapy guided by CYP2 C19 gene detection has good effect on the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome,and has obvious cost effect benefit and pharmacoeconomics advantage.
作者 金莞 杨魁 江佳 李越然 汪盛 李龙 袁梦 武元竹 叶明琪 栾家杰 JIN Wan;YANG Kui;JIANG Jia;LI Yue-ran;WANG Sheng;LI Long;YUAN Meng;WU Yuan-zhu;YE Ming-qi;LUAN Jia-jie(School of pharmacy,Wannan Medical College,Anhui Wuhu 241002,China)
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第2期147-152,共6页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金 安徽省科技攻关项目(编号:1604a0802097) 医学科研发展基金-临床与基础研究专项(编号:YXKY-WS005E)。
关键词 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 药物经济学 成本-效果分析 CYP2C19基因 Ticagrelor clopidogrel pharmacoeconomics cost-effectiveness analysis CYP2C19 gene
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献139

  • 1梁岩,朱俊,谭慧琼,李建冬,刘力生,OASIS登记试验中国地区协作组.中国地区非ST抬高急性冠脉综合征患者生存时间的影响因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(13):873-878. 被引量:18
  • 2王晖,杨志健,黄峻,朱铁兵,王连生,曹克将.经皮冠状动脉内支架植入术对外周血单核细胞NF-κB活性的影响[J].第四军医大学学报,2005,26(16):1475-1477. 被引量:4
  • 3He J, Gu D, Wu X, et al. Major causes of death among men and women in China[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005,353:1124-1134.
  • 4World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control.The Atlas of heart disease and stroke[S]. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
  • 5Beaglehole R. Global cardiovascular disease prevention:time to get serious[J]. Lancet, 2001,358(9282):661-663.
  • 6中华人民共和围卫生部.中国卫生统计年鉴(2011)[M].1版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2011:292-338.
  • 7Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology[J]. Eur.Heart J, 2008,29(23):2909-2945.
  • 8Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur.Heart J, 2007,28(13): 1598-1660.
  • 9Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/ non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 2007,116(7): 148-304.
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,361:1045-1057.

共引文献238

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部