期刊文献+

基于不同周期PM_(2.5)组成高时间分辨观测的PMF源解析研究 被引量:9

PMF source apportionment based on high time-resolved measurements of PM_(2.5) components during different observation periods
原文传递
导出
摘要 于2017年1月1日—12月31日对南京市城区大气细粒子(PM_(2.5))化学组分(元素、水溶性离子和碳质组分)的小时质量浓度进行连续观测,采用正矩阵因子分析(Positive Matrix Factorization,PMF)模型分别基于全年观测数据(PMF全年)和逐月观测数据(PMF月份)进行源解析,比较不同观测周期源解析结果的差异以及对PM_(2.5)各组分浓度估算的准确性.结果表明:不同观测周期下,PMF源解析结果中因子类型未发生改变,但因子组成和贡献分布存在较大差异.由于PMF模型假设同一观测周期内源成分谱不发生变化,只有基于逐月观测数据的PMF源解析才能体现全年范围内因子组成和贡献分布的变化.尽管PMF全年和PMF月份的分析结果均能准确估算PM_(2.5)组分的月均浓度,但PMF月份结果对各组分小时浓度的估算值和观测值在时间变化上更一致.这是因为PMF模型要求对各组分浓度的平均值进行拟合,易低估(或高估)PM_(2.5)组分在观测周期内的极大(或极小)值.因此,基于短期(例如,月份)高分辨观测数据的PMF分析能改进对PM_(2.5)组分浓度时间变化的模拟. In this study,hourly-resolved fine particle(PM_(2.5))components(elements,water-soluble inorganic ions,and carbon contents)were continuously monitored in urban Nanjing from January 1 to December 31,2017.Positive Matrix Factorization(PMF)was deployed for source apportionment based on full-year(PMFfull-year)and month-by-month(PMFmonth)measurement data,and the source apportionment results for different observation periods and PMF estimations of PM_(2.5)component concentrations were compared.The results indicated that the identified types of factors were the same,but the factor profiles and distributions differed substantially between PMFfull-year and PMFmonth solutions.As the PMF model presumes constant factor profiles during a certain observation period,only the analysis based on month-by-month data can reflect the changes in factor profiles and distributions for the whole year.Although both PMFfull-year and PMFmonth estimated monthly averages of PM_(2.5)components accurately,the hourly concentration time series of individual species derived from PMFmonth results were in better agreement with measurements.This is because the PMF model requires that the measured average concentrations to be fit well,and tends to underestimate(or overestimate)the extremely large(or small)values during a specific observation period.Therefore,the PMF analysis based on short-term(e.g.,monthly)measurement data with high time-resolution can improve the simulation of temporal variations of PM_(2.5)components.
作者 张远远 戴维 华楠 徐振麒 陆鑫雨 谢鸣捷 ZHANG Yuanyuan;DAI Wei;HUA Nan;XU Zhenqi;LU Xinyu;XIE Mingjie(School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044;Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control,Nanjing 210044;Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology,Nanjing 210044)
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期308-317,共10页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No.41701551)。
关键词 PM_(2.5) PMF源解析 观测周期 高时间分辨观测 PM_(2.5) PMF source apportionment observation period high time-resolved measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献72

共引文献258

同被引文献177

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部