期刊文献+

孕产妇孕产期静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的最佳证据总结 被引量:3

Best Evidence Summary of Risk Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and Puerperium
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的获取国内外孕产妇孕产期相关静脉血栓风险评估的最佳证据,为构建评估工具提供参考依据。方法应用循证医学的方法,通过计算机检索Up To Data、BMJ、Cochrane Library、JBI、GIN、NCG、NICE、CMA、RNAO、PubMed、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学数据库,选取符合纳入标准的相关文献,并通过2名研究员对文献进行独立的质量评价、证据提取及总结。结果共纳入文献12篇,其中包括临床实践指南6篇,高级临床决策1篇,系统评价5篇。从12篇文献中提取26条证据,最终整合形成4个维度,分别为既往因素(9条)、妊娠因素(4条)、产后因素(7条)和临时因素(6条)。结论基于循证证据总结孕产妇孕产期静脉血栓栓塞风险最佳证据,实现对孕产妇孕产期静脉血栓栓塞发生风险的动态评估,通过风险分层达到个体化风险管理的目的。 Objective To search the best evidence of risk assessment of venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium at home and abroad,and to provide reference for the construction of assessment tool.Methods We searched databases including Up to Data,BMJ,Cochrane Library,JBI,GIN,NCG,NICE,CMA,RNAO,PubMed,Embase,CNKI,Wanfang database and China biomedical database by computer for literature meeting the inclusion criteria.Two researchers conducted independent quality evaluation,evidence extraction and summary of the literature.Results Twelve articles were enrolled,including 6 clinical practice guidelines,1 advanced clinical decision and 5 systematic reviews.A total of 26 pieces of best evidence were integrated into 4 domains:previous factors(9 pieces of evidence),pregnancy-related factors(4 pieces of evidence)postpartum factors(7 pieces of evidence)and temporary factors(6 pieces of evidence).Conclusion The individualized risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in pregnant and puerperal women plays an important role in the prevention of pregnant and puerperal related thrombosis and provides evidence-based basis for clinical workers.
作者 向御婷 褚婕 严敏 乐曲 余嘉欣 XIANG Yu-ting;CHU Jie;YAN Min;LE Qu;YU Jia-xin(Dept.of Vascular Surgery,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430000,China)
出处 《护理学报》 北大核心 2022年第3期46-51,共6页 Journal of Nursing(China)
基金 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院科研处2020年度药技护专项基金(F016.02004.20001.070)。
关键词 妊娠期 产褥期 静脉血栓 危险因素 风险评估 pregnancy puerperium venous thrombosis risk factor risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献102

  • 1R. Brian Haynes,陈耀龙(译),刁骧(审校).研究、综述、摘要、总结、系统:循证卫生保健决策的“5S”信息服务演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(5):330-332. 被引量:23
  • 2Woolf SH,Grol R,Hutchinson A,Eccles M,Grimshaw J.Clinical guidelines:potential benefits,limitations,and harms of clinical guidelines.BMJ.1999;318(7182):527-530.
  • 3Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines Io M.Clinical practice guidelines:directions for a new program.Washington:National Academy Press.1990.
  • 4Browman GP,Snider A,Ellis P.Negotiating for change.The healthcare manager as catalyst for evidence-based practice:changing the healthcare environment and sharing experience.Healthc Pap.2003;3(3):10-22.
  • 5Grol R.Success and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice.Med Care.2001;39(8Suppl2):1146-1154.
  • 6Davis DA,Taylor-Vaisey A.Translating guidelines into practice.A systematic review of theoretic concepts,practical experience and research evidenceinthe adoption of clinical practice guidelines.CMAJ.1997;157(4):408-416.
  • 7GrimshawJ,Russell I.Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice:a systematic reviewof rigorous evalua-tions.Lancet.1993;342(8883):1317-1322.
  • 8Shaneyfelt TM,Mayo-Smith MF,Rothwangl J.Are guidelines following guidelines-The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature.JAMA.1999;281(20):1900-1905.
  • 9Grilli R,Magrini N,Penna A,Mura G,Liberati A.Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies:the need for critical appraisal.Lancet.2000;355(9198):103-106.
  • 10Burgers JS,Fervers B,Haugh M,Brouwers M,Browman G,Philip T,Cluzeau FA.International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument.J Clin Oncol.2004;22(10):2000-2007.

共引文献1927

同被引文献51

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部