期刊文献+

论商事代理任意解除权之法律限制

The Legal Restriction of the Right of Arbitrary Rescission of Commercial Agency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 商事委托关系的构建是商事代理关系的重要前提,现行《民法典》第933条调整了《合同法》第410条的规则,但仍存在商事委托中任意解除权适用范围不明、法院对约定抛弃解除权的内容效力判定不一,以及合同终止后的损害赔偿责任不清等问题。为此,完善商事代理中委托合同解除权的法律规则成为一种现实需求。区分民商事委托合同下任意解除权的适用、承认双方约定抛弃解除权的效力、允许可得利益的赔偿请求,以及发挥合同意思自治弥补法律缺位等应是可行之举。 The construction of commercial entrustment relationship is an important premise of commercial agency relationship.Article 933 of the current“The Civil Law Code”adjusts the rules of article 410 of“The Contract Law”,but there are still some problems,such as the unclear scope of application of the right of arbitrary termination in commercial entrustment,the different judgment of the court on the content and effectiveness of abandoning the right of termination,and the unclear liability for damages after the termination of the contract.Therefore,it is a realistic need to improve the legal rules of the right to terminate the entrustment contract in commercial agency.It should be feasible to distinguish the application of arbitrary termination right under civil and commercial entrustment contract,recognize the effect of abandoning termination right agreed by both parties,allow compensation claims for available benefits,and give full play to the contract autonomy to make up for the absence of law.
作者 林韶 刘影 LIN Shao;LIU Ying(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2022年第3期69-72,共4页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 商事代理 委托合同 任意解除权 限制 commercial agency commission contract the right of arbitrary recission restriction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献121

共引文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部