简版负面评价恐惧量表在不同性别大学生测量等值性与其结构检验

Measurement equivalence and structural test of the brief version of Negative Evaluation Fear Scale in college students of different genders

目的:考察简版负面评价恐惧量表的模型结构拟合与其在不同性别大学生中的测量等值性。方法:使用简明负面评价恐惧量表对1062名大学生进行调查。结果:通过模型拟合发现简版负面评价恐惧量表正反两维度模型(χ^(2)/df=5.71,CFI=0.96,TLI=0.95,SRMR=0.032)拟合优于单维度模型,简明负面评价恐惧量表-正向计分题模型拟合指标(χ^(2)/df=7.78,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.95,SRMR=0.03)、信度(Cronbach’sα系数为0.91)优于正反两维度简版负面评价恐惧量表。在等值性检验中正反两维度简版负面评价恐惧量表和简明负面评价恐惧量表-正向计分题只符合形态等值和弱等值。结论:简明负面评价恐惧量表-正向计分题具有更好的信度和拟合指数。正反两维度简版负面评价恐惧量表和简明负面评价恐惧量表-正向计分题不具备跨性别测量强等值性。

Objective:To investigate the model fix andmeasurement invariance of the brief version of Negative Evaluation Fear Scale(BFNES)across gender in a sample of college students.Methods:The BFNES were accomplished by 1062 college students.Results:Through the model comparisons,we found that 2-factor modelfitting index(χ^(2)/df=5.71,CFI=0.96,TLI=0.95,SRMR=0.032)better than the 1-factormodelfor the BFNES.The model fitting index(χ^(2)/df=7.78,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.95,SRMR=0.03)and reliability(Cronbach’s α coefficientwas 0.91)of Brief version of Fear of Negative Evaluation scale-Straightforward(BFNE-S)model was better than the 2-factor BFNES.According to the testing of the measurement equivalence,only the configural equivalence and metric equivalence of the 2-factor model BFNES and BFNE-S across gender were acceptable.Conclusion:BFNE-S has the better reliability and fitting index.2-factor model BFNE and BFNE-S hasn’t strong measurement equivalence across gender.