期刊文献+

父母离间行为量表中文版的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Parental Alienation Behaviors Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:本土化修订贝克策略量表(Baker Strategy Questionnaire,BSQ),并在中学生群体中检验该量表的信效度。方法:共招募930名中学生(男生470人,女生460人)施测,初始测试后间隔两周,选取95名被试进行重测。结果:父母离间行为量表各项目得分与量表总分相关系数0.617-0.930。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析支持父母离间行为量表的单因素结构(χ^(2)/df=2.115,RMSEA=0.038,GFI=0.933,CFI=0.942,NFI=0.887,IFI=0.889,TLI=0.896)。父母离间行为量表的分半信度系数、内部一致性系数和重测信度系数分别为0.912,0.95,0.863。父母离间行为量表与流调中心抑郁量表、自尊量表、情感虐待量表以及绝望量表的相关系数分别为0.381、-0.259、0.267、0.311(P<0.01)。结论:中文版父母离间行为量表具有良好的信效度,可在中国文化背景下使用。 Objective:To localize the Baker Strategy Questionnaire(BSQ),and test its reliability and validity in middle school students.Methods:A total of 930 middle school students(470 were male and 460 were female)participated in this study,and two weeks later after the first test,95 students were tested again.Results:The correlation coefficients between the score of each item and the total score of the scale were from 0.617 to 0.930,and each item showed a good discriminability.Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the one-factor model of the scale(χ^(2)/df=2.115,RMSEA=0.038,GFI=0.933,CFI=0.942,NFI=0.887,IFI=0.889,TLI=0.896).The split-half reliability coefficient,Cronbachαcoefficient,and test-retest reliability coefficient for the parental alienation behaviors scale was 0.912,0.951 and 0.863 respectively.The result of the parental alienation behaviors scale was significantly correlated with depression(CES-D),self-esteem,emotional abuse,hopelessness,and the coefficients were 0.381,-0.259,0.267,0.311(P<0.01)respectively.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the parental alienation behaviors scale is a good valid and reliable instrument to assess the parental alienation behaviors in Chinese culture.
作者 王堃炎 黄涛 林冰冰 叶一舵 WANG Kun-yan;HUANG Tao;LIN Bing-bing;YE Yi-duo(School of Psychology,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350117,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期41-44,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 父母离间行为量表 信度 效度 Parental alienation behaviors scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

共引文献622

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部